Campbell-Bradley ruled a No Contest/ Almost come to blows!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beenie, Aug 24, 2009.


  1. Holmesy

    Holmesy Interloper Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 29, 2008
    See if you can respond without insults. I've no idea what FCS stands for.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    Because if I am to question the character of Nate Campbell, I must have some prior incidents as a basis for my argument. I think Campbell is a drama queen, he enjoys the role of controversial spokesperson, and there is always a drama where Nate is concerned.

    I feel he could have continued despite the injury he suffered, and he was so adamant for the fight to be stopped because he saw the perfect opportunity to get out of a fight he was losing without suffering a loss on his record. In my opinion.
    I also think that'd be ridiculous. Who's said these things?

    It's important to sight why the overwhelming majority of people here are not siding with Nate Campbell over this issue. The guy does more talking than he does fighting, and he has absolutely nobody to blame but himself regarding his career. That said, the fight should have been changed to a NC according to the rules, but I still call his character into question. How many times is this guy going to have to vindicate himself. Bradley put it right.

    "You got away with quitting".
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    .....Are you SERIOUS? HOW ****ING STUPID ARE YOU?? SERIOUSLY?
     
  4. Holmesy

    Holmesy Interloper Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 29, 2008
    People have been making out he deserves the TKO against him because of past actions, which I don't agree with. I thought you were one of them - didn't realise you think it should have been a NC. In that case question his character all you want - it's a valid question to ask whether he was bullshitting - it just doesn't come into the TKO/NC equation.
     
  5. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
  6. Holmesy

    Holmesy Interloper Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 29, 2008
    You can write in capitals, come out with all sort of insults, emoticons and abbreviations, but why not just respond? I'm only questioning two short sentences, it shouldn't be that difficult.
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    Absolutely.

    Ever since Nate Campbell scored his career defining win against Juan Diaz, he has been all talk and no action. He failed to make weight, Guzman failed to make weight, and when he does finally fight he scrapes past Funeka in a questionable decision, and then he bows out after three rounds against Timothy Bradley. I am not disputing the decision, I am questioning whether or not Campbell could have continued. I think he could.

    I want to see a rematch.
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    San Rafael, perhaps it is time you explained your position?
     
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Addie, perhaps it is time you SHUT THE **** UP? Mind your own goddamn business.
     
  11. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    :lol: Fair enough.
     
  12. Holmesy

    Holmesy Interloper Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 29, 2008
    I take it you've got nothing, then.
     
  13. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    He cant explain it because he doesnt understand it...

    He makes comments about people being stupid, but he fails to understand that for whatever reason the fight was stoppage it was as a result of the headbutt. For reasonable people its not hard to understand, I will leave it at that.
     
  14. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008

    Not making weight against Funeka and dropping his guard against Peden has absolutely no relevancy to the context of this discussion which is centered around whether Campbell was truthful in his claims of seeing spots in his vision and the ref's negligence in how he handled the unintentional butt.
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Still ASSHURT, eh? :rofl I had to call your dumb ass out. :rofl

    Just LOOK how STUPID you are. ^^^^^ Just look at that ****.. :rofl:rofl:rofl LMAO!!!!!

    I appreciate you laying it out like that.. I do.. I really do.. :yep