Anyone believe JMM is the Lb4Lb best boxer in the world?

Judges. Long day today.

 

Reality is so awesome. Divac you should try to visit there sometimes. Don't you get bored in your imaginary land.

 

So if someone doesn't have hard time it means the fight was a FLUKE? And if someone has hard time it means IT WAS SUPER DUPER!

That's the thing on Pac, Pac makes everyone look slow,old,weight drained and shot even if they aren't because of his speed and power alone.

 

Sure buddy...atsch
....because David Diaz wasn't slow and utter ****, and De La Hoya wasn't old, shot, and weight drained.

:hi:

 

If Paul Wiliams can be see as top 3 with his less then stellar resume, why not...

 

Do you have Mosley in your top 5?

 

Keep hitting your head eze . . . I'm not claiming that judges don't commit mistakes . . . I posted that to disprove Divac's claim that JMM wooped Pacquiao.

Does that show JMM wooped Pacquiao? Are you claiming all six judges made wrong decissions on both fights and you and your gang and your claims are more credible?

Yes there was an error on the first fight with one stupid judge commiting an scoring error which deprived Pacquiao of a victory . . . now that's a fact not just my claim.

 

atsch P4P doesn't mean **** to anyone but you fanboys...

 

It was a simple question. atsch

 

Me and my gang?

I have Pac-JMM at 1 a piece.

But you act by showing those pictures of the decision that it automatically makes it correct that Pac was judged the winner.

 

And you got my answer you simpleton.

 

You didn't answer my question. Instead you tried to insult me, and failed.

 

Juan Diaz was not undefeated when JMM beat him. Unless you meant he was formerly undefeated.

and tbh if Pac had struggled against Oscar and Hatton he would have gotten more credit for those wins than he did by dominating. Cause the attitude that most fans have is "If it was that easy then his opponent MUST be shot". Lets not mention that PAcquiao was fighting 17lbs below the weight limit of the Oscar fight earlier that same year... That sort of information doesn't fit the agenda

 

I bet this is gonna be the same sh*t over and over again.

 

Reading between the lines is not your strong point is it. Do I really need to spell it out for you? Or can't you take a ****in hint? atsch