All Time Flyweight Tournament Round 3: Jung-Koo Chang vs Shoji Oguma

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Pea, Aug 28, 2009.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    The ferocity of Chang or the patience of Oguma?
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    I like Chang to overwhelm the more patient and technically correct boxer in Oguma with his ferocious attacks and relentless workrate. I think hed take a 15 round UD
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Definitely Chang for my money. I think he would be able to actually evade shots, because his own would be landing relentlessly. Wins a decision.
     
  4. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    Yeah, to be honest I can only see Chang losing to Harada. Possibly Perez.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    yeh hes a beast H2H i think Harada could do it definitly not sure on Perez aint watched alot of him.

    The old adage styles make fights dont really apply to Changas he just kinda goes through styles
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I was going to say Chang to win it, but didn't want to sound out of order. Him and Harada? Don't tease me.

    I'm just going through your fights now Sweet Pea.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    :lol: so true.
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    its unbelieveable he just goes through

    i agree with Pea i think Perez could beat him but it would be very close and id pick Chang just now but itd be a SD
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    To be honest I haven't seen ANYTHING of Perez. He's on my next to check out list I guess.

    will tube him when I get in, I hear he's fierce.
     
  10. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009
    oguma is completely overrun by chang who wins a wide wide decision if not stopping oguma late due to accumaltive affects of punches landed
     
  11. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    You're selling Oguma short here. I agree that Chang wins, but Oguma was too experienced and well schooled to be completely overwhelmed or stopped by the smaller, not so hard hitting Chang.
     
  12. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009

    i just see chang throwing three times as many punches as oguma, so i dont see oguma winning many rounds and so was leaning towards a very wide decision for chang. i admit the stoppage would only be very late with the acclumative effect of the punches being the reason not the power ,but i was only stating it was a possibility
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Do you feel that Chang was definitely an accumulative hitter then Pea?Because there are times when he throws some seriously heavy single shots or short combos. Looks deadly to me.
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    His offensive attack when he got going in full flow was mind blowing, there's no other way put it. You very rarely see the things he did pulled off so efficiently in a boxing ring. However, if he had legitimate KO power, a lot of those amazing combinations he put together would've left his opponents waking up the next day in the hospital. Watch the seventh round of his fight against Tokashiki. The onslaught he unleashes is one of the most impressive I've ever seen, yet he never gets his man down. He was a damaging accumulation hitter, though he lacked legit KO power.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    good points:good