Very clear win for huck. Only thing that might **** people off is that he was clinching all the time, but when he wasnt clinching he was throwing mean combinations which connected. Ramirez was following him around but was innefective, won a few rounds based on activity and the point deduction from Huck made it somewhat close but in general a clear win for Marco Huck
Yeah, he came back stronger in your opinion, he hold or low-blowed him and fouled his way illegally out to counter the Argentinian when he was hurt. IMO it isn´t enough for a challenger to throw 10 punches a round. Even if Ramirez punches were often at the guard, he still had way more punches on his target.
Even in German forum they almost all agree that Huck lost. I have here 2 German friends tht cheered for Huck (and because of that me too) but we 3 all agree that it was the wrong decision
Huck won Clearly All Rameriz did was Follow Huck around the ring and Thow a Flurry of Punches once a round
From what I hear it wasn't a robbery and the thread maker is the only person who thinks it's a robbery. Why is that every close fight somebody always has to say "Oh man so and so was robbed?" **** that **** gets old.
WHAT? What fight were you watching? Again, I BET on Ramirez, and I thought it was pretty clear that Huck won. The scores were right on point, too.
Maybe a Argentinian sneked into the editing booth as he landed nowhee near 50%. Lucky to land 20% aswell.
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=165571 Read my round notes. I watched the fight and I scored it 115-112 for Huck.