I respect Huck as a fighter, he showed chin, heart, some skills (jab for example at times) and power,but IMO he lost the fight clearly by at least 2 points.
If I rewatched the fight wearing and Argentinian football shirt, a Ramirez mask and had 15 pints before hand then I could have possibly scored the fiight a draw at best.
I would think if Huck didn't win then there would be an outrage and the corruption talk would start up and robbery, etc.
I had Huck 8 to 4, 115-112. Easy fight to score. Huck landed the better punches, and while Ramirez rung his bell, Huck actually had him hurt and in some shape a few times.
But why did the fans cheer for Huck before and during their fight and catcalled him after the decision was read? When it was so clear and one-sided? And why landed Ramirez more punches in the whole fight? Why lost the Argie when he was the aggressor as the champ? I could go on...
Huck won, close but clear. 116-111 is a bit too wide though, with a point deducted from Huck for repeated low blows.
Even if you had Ramirez ahead, how could you have him so far ahead that you think the decision for Huck would be corrupt? I wasn't rooting for either fighter and I can't understand how anyone could call this a robbery, before the decision was announced I had no doubt it was a UD for Huck, even the Swedish announcer gave Huch a wide decision.
What kind of Italian are you then????????????????????????......... Sorry couldn't help it. Join date in 2006 and more than 2000 post, one would think you likes boxing! This was a very though fight with a clear 4 points, 3 points with the deduction for Huck. Great competitive fight who i didn't expect to go the distance after the first 2-3 rounds :bbb
its so easy saying something as "i bet on him" after all, who knows you could of only bet 5 or 20 dollars....which is nothing. I had to work today so i couldnt watch this fight. but i wouldnt be suprised if Ramirez did get jobbed.