Anyone believe JMM is the Lb4Lb best boxer in the world?

doesnt matter.

 

I have Pacquiao at #1 and JMM at #2, but I should say that I thought JMM won the first fight, the second one was a draw in my eyes.

If JMM beats Floyd and Pacquiao beats Cotto, JMM will take over as P4P #1 in my book.

 

To who? I make my own ratings.. I could give a **** what 99.9% of people think of anything..

 

atleast you left .1%:good

 

Indeed..

 

!st fight I scored for Pac, the second fight I scored a draw. Both fights where so close and to be fair both should of been a draw.

But Pac is number 1 P4P.

 

wow.. you have an impaired vision. the 1st fight was a clear win for pac.. second fight could've gone either way, however you have to favor the aggressor and the fighter who landed the more telling blows..

 

And you need to learn how to score a round. :-(

 

he proved he was the far more superior boxer against pac twice plus when he moved up in weight he took the harder fight so you could make a case

 

If you scored round by round (which *******s dont) you'd find that JMM did land the more telling blows in the great majority of the rounds.

......thats just the thing about Marquez againt Pacquiao......he was not only outboxing and outlanding Pacquiao. Marquez was consistently landing cleaner, crisper and more telling blows.

.....goodness, Pac was'nt just eating Marquez shots and walking through them.......he was consistently driving Pac back for cover to the ropes.


Note: Pac scored some knockdowns, but you only attribute the scoring of those knockdowns to the rounds that they occured in.
Keep Following along, and keep paying attention to the fight happenings and the round proceedings that occur after you've already scored a round that a knockdown occured.
Score each round seperately.

If you keep round by round tabs that way it should be done, you'll find that JMM decisions Pac in both fights.

Its elementary, but not comprehensible to the *******.........at least conveniently to a fight that involves Manny Pacquiao scoring a knockdown!

 

Yes. Jmm imo proved he was the better fighter.

 

Losing to Manny Pacquiao in close fights doesnt make him the best neither does lossing to Chris John, however since promoted by GBP from their perspective he is the best, and since he is fighting Mayweather in Floyds mind JMM is the man to beat to regain his spot as the P4P best, He isnt the best p4p they are just saying that to help sell this fight.

 

He lost both fights so how does that make him the better fighter?:think DLH lost a close SD to Floyd does that make OScar better than FLoyd? so then how does it make JMM better than Manny?

 

Ok Symph now you're starting to scare me.atsch

:good

 

nope!