I agree. They talk this nonsense before all his fights that he's distracted, that Roach is unhappy, balh, blah, blah. Then Pac gets in the ring and is a sucking tornado. Every time.
Pac needs to show roach some loyalty, To many times this has happend to boxers whot hink there above and beyond the rest , Cotto will not be taking this fight lightly so pac shouldent also. Cotto for KO!!
Roach is worried, he promised all these things from pacman about destroying cotto and now pacquiao is making the same mistakes tyson did against douglas. Cotto by ko9 in a brutal yes brutal skull stoving. Mark my words!
The more and more as time goes by, i think cotto is going to win the fight. I was predicting a Pac decision, but now im thinking Cotto may KO Pac. Pac is taking him far to lightly. I dont like the lack of respect he seems to have for Roach atm.
i think those entourages give pac some stuff to make him like this. pac takes this stuff __cks __ssy and __s , enjoys life , and under the influence , this is all he cares about. why do you think those 'entourages' are around him ? this is what they do for their living. i wonder how much pac pays them.
only 73 days, and he has to be in that ring with a calculated killer, he is just letting time slip through his fingers
Lets do a side by side comparison to Oscar De La Hoya, who I don't even have in the top 30, let alone top 20 or 25. This content is protected , This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected You really fail to realize that Whitaker is leagues above Morales and Quartey is leagues above Larios, especially the Morales Pac fought, infact, Pac lost to a past prime, shot Morales, that has to be taken into consideration. Also Larios was way past his best and Quartey was in his prime. That is a fact. A Prime Oscar towers over Morales and Larios, especially the one that Pac fought and lost too. It's an undenialble fact that Morales lost to a past prime Barrera, and journey man Zahir Raheem before Pac was able to beat him. Yeah, I'll look. I'll also look at where Mosley ranks right now, and how he looks compared to the ODLH that Pac beat. As for Hatton-Vargas, Vargas is leagues above Hatton, Vargas was naturally bigger than ODLH, and on steroids! Vargas' skills are leagues above Hatton's. Hatton makes Vargas look like Sugar Ray Leonard. If you'd understand boxing, you wouldn't fail to realize why Vargas and Mosley in 2003 were harder fights that 2008 ODLH and 2009 Hatton. That's how I know you're ignorant to boxing. Oscar moved up to fight Whitaker (P4P#2), Castillejo (WBC champ), Vargas was bigger, Trinidad was bigger, Mosley on roids was bigger, Miguel Angel Gonzalez was bigger, Ruelas was actually bigger, and Hopkins and Sturm were far beyond just bigger. Oscar took on the best all the time, that is something Pac CANNOT say (ALL THE TIME). You truly never saw Oscar in his prime did you? A Prime Oscar was faster, his handspeed was compared to the Sugars, and his POP was devastating. Hell, their KO % is about the same, the main difference being that ODLH fought much better opposition that Pac. IM WAITING This content is protected Lets do this! The Barrera that Pac fought had been pro 14 years had 3 losses, two in which he was brutally f-ed up and one where he took a sever beating while dishing one out, and 57-3-0. That's three beatings. Pernell was 12.5 years pro and should have been 40-0-0, p4p #2. Chavez was 12.5 years pro, was 96-1-1 Should have been 96-2. But had never had a beating like Barrera. ODLH moved up from 140 to fight the Whitaker at 147. ODLH had one fight at 140 before fighting Chavez at 140 who already had a whoppong 8 fights under his belt at Jr. WW. Pacquaio has fought Diaz, ODLH, Hatton after MAB and EM. ODLH fought Vargas, Mayorga, Hopkins, Mosley, Trinidad, Gatti, Castillejo and Quartey after JCC and Pea. I don't see your argument anymore. This content is protected In part I'm glad you realize and admit Morales was shot. Secondly, Whitaker was NOT coming off a humiliating loss a la Morales. Infact Whitaker should have been undefeated coming into the fight with DLH and had had some impressive wins vs great opposition in his previous fights. Unfortunately Whitaker didn't deal well with the loss, got on the junk and ruined the rest of his career with drugs. Let me school you on something. Shotness is not necessarily and always attributed to age. Size is not always attributed to height. You know Whiatker had beat JCV years before he lost to DLH, JCV the man that decked Winky Wright 5 times. ODLH moved up to 147, a weight he was unfamiliar with to fight the reigning champ. :rofl:rofl:rofl No you just didn't say that! First Quartey was in the PRIME of his LIFE, Larios was PAST his prime, Quartey was undefeated, and had one of the best jabs of his era. Larios was a good B level fighter in his prime. Quartey had an iffy fight where he should have won easy, but because of Kds he ended up getting a questionable draw. His previous win was a little over a year and a half. A Shane was on steroids was was clearly the stronger man that night. Oscar was clearly the smarter man. You still didn't prove why EM was a better win than Whitaker, Mab a better win than JCC, Hatton a better win than Vargas. So DLH has a few losses at the twighlight of his career, Pac has some in the beggining. It is very common for great fighters to rack up a few loses towards the end. All you did was TRY to dissect ODLH resume, very uneffectively, but never even mentioned Pac's. You can dissect ODLH's resume all you want, but it's still better than Pac's. This content is protected WTF??! Do you even follow boxing? Sure DLH had youth on his side, but how many times have we seen skill beat Speed?? HUNDREDS. Morales had been fighting pro for 13 years when Pac finally beat him, had been in a several grueling wars and was obviously at the end of his career. Past his BEST, and arguably SHOT. Morales was not even a titlist, he wasn't even P4P, hell, out of Morales' last 6 fights he only won one, his hast hurrah vs Pac. GREAT indicator of shotness. JCC had been pro for 12.5 years when DLH beat him, had one loss and a nice winning streak since, was the WBC champion and considred P4P. He still continued winning after with the exception of the DLH rematch. You're F-ing insane if you think Morales was a better win. This content is protected :hi:
That's not an excuse atsch How the hell can a boxer be at one hundred percent if he is distracted when training? UliUli you're ridiculous.
DOUBLE F-ing STANDARDS AGAIN! Do you know what MAB's distractions were while preparing for the Pac fight? Things OUT OF HIS CONTROL. Pac on the other hand is just being a dumbass.