How underrated are pac's skills?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by trowell22, Sep 6, 2009.


  1. trowell22

    trowell22 Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Aug 6, 2009
    For those who have seen pac fight...
    How underrated are his skills?
     
  2. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Not very.

    Most seem to know exactly what he is.

    A very good, proficient boxer with god-given speed, power and athleticism.

    But no, I will never confuse Pacquiao with a master boxer. He's more of a force of nature than a surgeon.
     
  3. Circa

    Circa Skate And Destroy Full Member

    2,228
    1
    Nov 22, 2006
    pac is an one-dimensional fighter that beat a so-called multi dimensional warriors :deal
     
  4. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,305
    18,821
    Jul 29, 2004
    Pretty overrated.
     
  5. kd_helix

    kd_helix oooh la la.. Full Member

    228
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    :good I agree with this one. but hey, you cant get all the good qualities IMHO.

    imagine if FLOyd adds aggression to his already formiddable defense and ring smarts, how complete and exciting floyd would be!:yep
     
  6. mantacougar1

    mantacougar1 Guest

    the thing that makes pacquiao so effective (especially when facing old and weight drained fighters) is his speed and athleticism.

    as far as his boxing skills go, he needs to improve alot more as he can easily get outboxed (morales and marquez X 2).
     
  7. trowell22

    trowell22 Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Aug 6, 2009
    i really can't imagine floyd having those, hehe,
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,532
    11,048
    Jul 28, 2009
    I wouldn't say they underrate the skills of the heralded p4p best. But, at one time he had very little skill but was winning titles in multiple weight classes with just pure speed and strength. The technical leaps and bounds of progress he made from the first Marquez fight to the second are really impressive. It's hard to gauge how much better he might be now as he hasn't been roughly challenged on a technical level since that second Marquez fight. But he's certainly looked brilliant.
     
  9. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    :good
     
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    pacquiao is a crude natural brawler.....watch some of manny's early fights with roach: sanchez, ledwaba, 3K Battery, marquez 1....he was a simple brawler with a devestating left hand.....

    Roach since the marquez 1 fight, has really focused on making manny into more of a "boxer"......

    The pacquiao right hand is very underrated these days.....he massacred de la hoya with it, and primarily used his right hand against hatton before the left punch KO...I expect to see more of it in the cotto fight
     
  11. El Radar

    El Radar Member Full Member

    342
    0
    Aug 8, 2009
    A very good boxer puncher now. He used to be a typical southpaw in the sense that he purely relied on his 1-2 to knock people out. Starting from the David Diaz fight he is more developed with better movement, more punch variety and a better body attack. I woulden't say he is underated but people always comeup with dumb excuses as to why he won.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac's skills have been underrated since he burst out on the scene. Today he's among the top 2 or 3 most skilled fighters in the sport.
     
  13. Sheehan

    Sheehan Guest

    agreed :good
     
  14. kd_helix

    kd_helix oooh la la.. Full Member

    228
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    PAC & COTTO kinda like rock stars. PBF and JMM = opera singers. :yep
     
  15. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008

    :lol::lol::lol: