I hadn't seen this one for awhile. I noticed when the referee was giving his instructions Minter appeared a good 3 inches taller than Hagler. Apart from the post fight bottles of beer being thrown into the ring and Hagler and his entourage running for cover, I think the most suprising thing about the fight was how much facial damage hagler did to minter's face in less than 3 rounds. Hagler definitely had good power, but in this fight it seemed that almost every punch that he landed caused a cut, nick, bruise, welt, or bleeding on Minter's face. At the end Minter looked like someone used a Ginsu knife on his face. This fight reminds me of when Donald Curry fought Colin Jones a few years later. Jones was a good skilled solid chinned fighter but against Curry, he like Alan Minter basically just ran out of skin and was stopped on horrendous cuts.
Typical British crowd, cheering at every attempt made by Minter - but don't let that fool you. At one point, the crowd cheers vehemently as they assume Minter landed a good one on Hagler's jaw (it actually slapped his chest), but if you look closely, Hagler then hits him with four or five punches going backwards when Minter tries to capitalize. Hagler must have landed three times as many punches as Minter over the course of the fight.
Man, that Hagler was extremely accurate back then. And he had quick legs and would move right in on a guy. But it seemed like Hagler just always hit torso even with his missed punches and just didn't catch air. Much much better version of Marvin than in his earlier or later days.
I'm British. But I concede that our fans are a bit too over the top, I mean, cheering a missed punch?
Well when you put it as simple as that it is a bit bizarre but you know what it's like with crowds specially when not everyone has got a good view..
He was surprisingly accurate on this occasion. Throughout his career observers have noted Hagler's tendency to throw punches in bunches with many catching air. One can see Hagler often walking into exchanges with a combination of punches in his head, practiced in drills, and executing them whether his opponent was there or not. It made him look robotic at times. He also tended to arm punch. I think this had a lot to do with how abnormally long his arms were (or at least appeared). But missed punches don't matter much given Hagler's relentless style during his prime.
I've read and heard a lot about how Minter hurt Hagler. It's did seem to me Hagler was ever hurt in that fight. The one punch they say knocked the train off course was met with several punches from Hagler that knocked Minter around. Minter was game. I will give him that. But Hagler would not be denied. I love the way the British commentator called the end of the fight. Very dramatic. Minter was powerless to thwart Hagler's attack. Hagler was amazing that night. He captured that moment again against Hearns. Imagine if Hagler had fought every fight that way. Usually, though he spent four rounds getting the measure of his man and then came on.
I was ringside that night, it ended ugly ,the bottles were plastic ,but when full and tossed from a height they would do some serious damage,if they made contact with you,we all stood up and turned to face them ,that way you could see them coming,Harry Gibbs was near me,he got up and stood in front of Terry Lawless's wife to shield her, not a good night for British Boxing by any standards. A great performance by Hagler went unacknowledged, as his corner hurried to get him to the safety of his dressing room.