Excluding lineal titles ... Pac has only won championships in 4 divisions

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fitzgeraldz, Sep 8, 2009.


  1. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    That's not needed here, this is a Pacquiao troll thread. Control yourself.
     
  2. mantacougar1

    mantacougar1 Guest

    totally agree! pacquiao has won four division world championships. since when does the ring belt count? to my knowledge it never has. if pacquiao beats cotto he would have won only his fifth title, still one short of de la hoya's record six.
     
  3. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    i'm saying pacman fans are going to come in and just say your hating and a bunch of other ****...

    off the top i personally wouldnt know or would have to research what your saying but ...i believe you because your credible and usually i agree with what your saying
     
  4. jrhjoker

    jrhjoker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,298
    0
    Aug 24, 2009
    DAVID DIAZ title should not count to because. of them other champs at that weight manny picked slow as **** DAVID........:D
     
  5. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    ****, this is a bad way to go after the might midget Pacquiao. Lineal titles to me, are better. I count those ****ers.
     
  6. g.dog

    g.dog Active Member Full Member

    578
    1
    Jun 20, 2009

    are you real?
     
  7. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    A guy who beats Barrera, Morales, Marquez, and Hatton is overrated?
     
  8. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Exactly what I was going to type. Being linear is way more important than holding 25% of the championship, I.e winning one belt.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    All things equal, lineal means more to me than a trinket, but it just depends on the situation. Sometimes the linear champ isn't the best in the division. In this situation, Barrera and Hatton are the best wins Pacquiao could get in those divisions.
     
  10. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    You're out of your mind. So what you're telling all of us is that Oscar beating BREDAHL for a WBO trinket at 130 was worth more than Pacquiao beating BARRERA (#3 P4P at the time) for the 126 LINEAL championship?

    Stop talking out of your behind.
     
  11. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    my understand is that oscar had 6 and sugar ray floyd and tommy hearns are legitamate 5 weight world champions.

    i still regard being a 4 weight world champion a pretty nifty accomplishment
     
  12. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,444
    15,353
    Dec 6, 2008
    Titles are stupid. Honestly Pac's a great fighter but I couldn't care less how many titles he has/gets in the future. Same for every other fighter. All that matters is the fights themselves.
     
  13. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    My thoughts exactly:yep
     
  14. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    Lineal titles are more impressive than alphabet titles :patsch
     
  15. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Lineal titles are really the only ones that count...