...in MMA. Obviously, it generally is, but let's play make-believe and assume for the sake of argument that the left hook is only minimally effective in MMA compared to boxing. Here's the question: How long would it take MMA fighters to discard the left hook and concentrate their training on more high-percentage techniques? My suspicion is that it would take a while. Why? Because MMA guys generally don't understand fighting with their hands as well as boxers do, EVEN THOUGH boxing isn't ideal for an MMA environment. They rely on boxing coaches to teach them because even though their sport is different, they still know less about fisticuffs than Freddy Roach and company. My suspicion is this: At the moment, MMA fighters still rely on BJJ guys to teach them grappling, Muay Thai coaches to teach them standup, boxing coaches to improve their hand techniques, and wrestling coaches to improve their takedowns. (And then there are guys with more unusual backgrounds like Parisyan with judo and Machida with karate). Right now, they still trust specialists whose techniques are designed for different environments, which has allowed a lot of "extra" stuff in. Sure it's useful, but perhaps it's not as high-percentage as the theoretically "ideal" skillset. Hence the extreme complexity of modern MMA manuals. I think that this will change in the years to come. The "basic" set of skills will be whittled down to a few types of punches, kicks, knees, elbows, throws, submissions, position-changes, and transitions in between. A lot of fighters will have extra "pet" techniques that they get to work pretty regularly, but the simplicity and efficiency will definitely increase. We won't have a lot of all-rounded GSP's running around, but we might have smoother, better-drilled Crocops and Lesnars.
And to answer the thread seriously, I don't think it will ever have "basic" anything, hence the name mixed martial arts.
I say its gonna get worse as mma advances. Certain fighters will implement a "safety 1st" style. for example fighters will improve their half guard position Basic kick boxing stick and move strategy, while avoiding the sprawl entirely by throwing themselves to the ground before any attempted takedown is in play. They will "assume the half guard position" . Example is what Thales Leites tried to do with Anderson Silva with the backwards takedown. Only this technique will be used against wrestlers. Which will render takedowns useless. Kind of like the boxing clinch . only from the ground.
I think a lot of fighters now employee a striking coach rather than just a boxing coach; usually the striking coach either runs an mma gym himself or is a part of a big team, and are there purely to teach striking as it relates to mma. Mark Dellagotte and Shawn Thompkins for example work nearly exclusively for mma, so if something isn't working they would pick up on it pretty quickly just due to the sheer numbers of fighters they work with. There are plenty of other guys, Ken Hahn, to name another who's clientele is MMA fighters, so I think it would get picked up fairly quickly.
Just take the frills off each sport and you have MMA at it's most effective. For example, in boxing you could (generally) discard shoulder roll. In BJJ discard the moves where you would manipulate the fighter by using his Gi against him... and so on. MMA is now reaching boxing's stage of finding the most efficient and effective mode of fighting. Boxing for hands, Muay Thai/Kickboxing for strikes, Wrestling and BJJ for the obvious. I also think Judo fits in nicely with some very effective throws. I'm intrigued to see what also works i.e. Karate.
:huh This has NOTHING to do with boxing vs. MMA. That makes about as much sense as accusing me of making a "wrestling vs. MMA", "Muay Thai vs. MMA", or "BJJ vs. MMA" thread. I'm using boxing as one example of a general phenomenon.
:good This is the sort of evolution that I'm referring to. Let us bear in mind, though, that many of the "bugs" in boxing weren't completely worked out after the 1920's rule changes and introduction of larger gloves. Greb & co., while very practical, highly trained individuals, still retained a few less-than-modern features. What I'm getting at is that it might take a while to go from "works quite well" to "works perfectly for its environment".
CT what's your conservative estimate on MMA reaching "al dente" so to speak? That is, more or less plateauing in developmental terms if it hasn't already? Do you see anomalies like Machida (who even in today's integrated landscape are able to utilize one hyper-focused discipline to great effect) disappearing or maintaining a niche in the "final draft" MMA world?
VERY good question. My guess is as follows: Boxing has its Hameds, so I think MMA will always have its Machidas. Heck, in terms of BOXING, I think that Fitzsimmons would have a good chance of beating most of today's middleweights simply because his style is so weird. The same will probably be true for Machida-types in MMA. Machida may be the vanguard of a flood of Shotokan-based people--most of whom will be unsuccessful. In any event, his art will continue to influence MMA through "Machida karate", and I expect some really top-notch performers to come out of his gyms after he retires and starts teaching. Over time, the things that made point karate successful will be integrated into MMA, and its "weirdness advantage" will disappear. How quickly MMA will progress can only be guessed at. Boxing took around 20 years to iron everything out, but then again, boxing is comparatively limited. Kickboxing took maybe 15 to transform from "full contact karate" into American-style kickboxing...although guys like Urquidez managed it within a single career (Wallace and Lewis arguably didn't). One thing that would vastly speed the process along would be widespread adoption of amateur MMA. Pankration had the best chance of becoming an Olympic sport (no head contact), and almost did the trick in the 2004 Greek Olympics. If it had, I suspect we'd see a lot more top-notch performers today. That's probably no longer an option, but the amateur scene should heat up in the next few years. Also, a respected amateur "USA MMA" organization, comparable to USA Judo and USA Boxing, would help ENORMOUSLY. I'd say another 10-20 years, depending on how widely you're asking about the "perfected" form spreading (i.e. available to everybody or just to the top guys?). Maybe that's too pessimistic, and you'll probably see some "al dente" performers before that time, but it'll take at least that long to see standardization start to work its way through the smaller gyms. (You'll probably also see some dreaded MMA McDojos sprouting as well...) Ideally, we'll know it's happened when we're finally confident that the best MMA striker can outstrike the K-1 champion under MMA rules and the best MMA grappler can outgrapple the Olympic freestyle wrestling champion under MMA rules.
I think MMA is on the fast lane to evolve into it's own style. I think MMA will be a misnomer in near future. There will be no mix, there will be just one style which includes everything. Even "anomalies" like Machida will be mixed. Which he is right now. Machida karate doesn't exactly include BJJ and he has to train that separately. In fact any type of striking is just it, striking. Saying that "Machida" karate is something unique and special, I think, is pretty far fetched. It's like saying Rampage boxing is what Rampage uses. Styles will ALWAYS vary depending on the person. Machida's style suites him because he's fast enough. If Rampage was to try learning his style it would exactly work because of how he functions physically at the core of it all. Basically, there will ALWAYs be differences just like there are in boxing. Some like to be the aggressors some like to be the counter-punchers. Some like to be on top in guard some will like to work from the bottom. etc.
I don't know what the future holds for mma. "Well rounded" can quickly become "hodgepodge" in today's scene. I'm not saying that with complete negativity. Forrest Griffin is a hodgepodge guy, and he has accomplished a lot in mma. Forrest Griffin is also extremely durable, shows up in great shape, and is trying to win as long as the fight lasts. Many fighters do not possess Griffin's durability nor will, and could struggle without a specialty. I truly believe that your better fighters will be masters of one aspect of fighting, and competent in all aspects of the game. They will find a niche, and excel; but be competent everywhere. Randy Couture excels in the clinch, but understands every area of the sport. Machida understands the different ranges of the sport well, but he knows how to steer a fight with his athletic talents. The most well rounded fighter in mma is arguably Georges St. Pierre. GSP is competent everywhere, but excels at takedowns. Pierre takes down opponents, and lands in favorable conditions as well as anyone. I think that fighters should explore the different worlds of effective martial arts, and attempt to master the form they excel at. After mastering said aspect, wrestling for example, the fighter could then compliment that fighter's game with more aspects. This way a fighter like Sherk only tries to outbox someone that is out wrestling him, for example.
I think this is basically the opposite of whats true. Dan Henderson would never have been the wrestler he is unless he devoted himself to it for all those years. Cro Cop the striker, Nog the grappler etc. The phrase 'well rounded' can **** off :twisted: ps, **** joe rogan