i know we all agree that RJJ is the best H2H fighter ever

RJJ may have been the most athletic fighter ever,but I dont rate him number 1 H2H or consider him unbeatable, by ANY STRETCH.

 

Carlos Monzon
middleweight 15 round fight would beat Roy Jones

 

He wouldnt embarrass hagler. He didnt embarrass Hopkins did he?

 

you guys are not understanding what i am saying H2H P4P same weights naturally no fighter would beat roy jones. robinson could not deal with roy jones at the same weight naturally. roy jones at robinsons weight would be faster then he was at 168lbs. and jones at 168lbs was faster then robinson. can you picture RJJ with 8oz gloves on. what damage he could do. jones footwork would be unreal at the lower weight class.
think about this roy jones the fastest fighter ever at 168lbs. just how fast would he be if he was naturally smaller. his timing is unreal he could read a punch before it was thrown

 

he totally made hopkins look like a b class fighter.
with one good hand.

 

carlos monzon u have to do better then that son. out of all the greats u chose him to go up agaisn't the best fighter ever.

SHOW A BIT OF RESPECT

 

Can any define what they mean by pound for pound, what the hell does it really mean? It seems to me to be one of those things that sound plausible but when you think about it for a while, it makes no sense.

 

Hopkins always struggled with fighters who had a serious speed advantage. Hopkins was great at neutralizing power, skills, size, but not speed.

 

As far as I'm concerned it means if every boxer was fighting at the same weight who would win head to head. Obviously its nearly impossible to decipher, especially if your matching Ricardo Lopez against Muhammad Ali pound for pound, who the hells gonna know that? Its all guess work really.

 

Yep! This is a bs thread.