A Pacquiao win is MUCH better for boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrtony80, Sep 14, 2009.

  1. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    hey! why'd you take away JMM:blood
     
  2. cougnuts510

    cougnuts510 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    0

    I love JMM but lets be real, he is 36 and father time is not on his side. Plus someone like Cotto could do some real damage to JMM if he isn't at the top of his game. I might change my mind after the Floyd fight but I seriously doubt he could fight at a higher weight as effectively as he did at 130 and or even 135.
     
  3. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    22,780
    Likes Received:
    350
    But De la hoya won't be a shot weight drain fighter at 154 pounds.
     
  4. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pac losing to Cotto would actually be good for boxing in the long run.

    Pac winning would just mean Pac/Floyd and then it just ends.

    Pac losing would mean Pac/JMM 3. Then Floyd/Cotto. Then winner of Floyd/Cotto vs. Mosley/Clottey...with that winner probably fighting winner of Pac/JMM 3.

    see...more fights if Pac loses. :good:yep
     
  5. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    30,220
    Likes Received:
    16,279
    That's not really what he's saying. He's not implying that should the fight go to the scorecards, Pac should get the nod because "it would be better for boxing". He's not saying that at all.
     
  6. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    17,643
    Likes Received:
    10
    Who cares who wins, it's the same old story there is nothing wrong with Boxing's healthy...eh **** it I sound like a broken record stating my facts, I'm not gonna keep repeating it.

    Anyway, who reads SI anyway? They are losing so many readers that they had that special deal with Madden. They are doing anything to get people to buy/read their product.
     
  7. cloud_cyc

    cloud_cyc p4p demon Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    0
    a pac loss might be good IMO for boxing. if he loses this one, he might have second thoughts about his other plans ( politics, acting, etc. ) and focus on boxing to regain his status. hell, he might even think twice about retiring early.
     
  8. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0
    my thoughts exactly.

    I seriously dont understand why people are demanding for such a fast crescendo :verysad...

    The best crescendos take time to develop...;)
     
  9. murphyslaw

    murphyslaw ESB Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe it's better for the sport long term if cotto wins. If Pacquiao only wants to box on for say another year, do we want him to beat more of these top guys and then retire leaving a void?

    Lets say Cotto goes on to fight for another 5 years. Isn't it more important that Cotto wins and becomes THE poster boy for boxing thereby giving the sport the kind of positive coverage we're all thinking of for a longer period of time?

    They're both great guys so either one winning is giving boxing a great role model. I can't wait for the fight.....
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    38,117
    Likes Received:
    5

    Great post. Cotto is a good little fighter. However, a Pac win combined with a Mayweather win would setup a mega fight that would bring a lot of attention to the sport. Pac is a very fan friendly fighter and can do a better job of elevating the sport than Cotto, IMO.
     
  11. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    60,376
    Likes Received:
    242
    Best fighting the best.... is MUCH better for boxing!
     
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    38,117
    Likes Received:
    5

    Cotto says he wants to retire around the age of 30. He's about to turn 29.
     
  13. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    18,768
    Likes Received:
    21
    The title of this tread couldn't be more correct. A Pacquiao win and a Mayweather win could potentially lead to a true superfight between two legendary ATG fighters. You dont get too many of those kind of matchups with that much significance.
     
  14. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    2
    good theory, but i think floyd would rematch jmm then fight pac if cotto wins. in other words, he'd never fight cotto.
     
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    10,481
    Likes Received:
    18
    A Pacquiao win is good for everything.