arthur abraham vs. mikkel kessler

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Sep 14, 2009.


  1. Finn73

    Finn73 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,322
    0
    Jun 22, 2008
    top post :good
     
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Decission or KO . . . I'll pick Kesller.

    Kesller can easily outwork AA.
     
  3. HolgerD

    HolgerD Armscontrol Full Member

    1,716
    0
    Sep 6, 2007
    Abraham probably have the power to hurt Kessler. I just don't see it happening provided that Kessler keep his distance. Kessler should be able to use his quicker footwork + slightly greater reach (185cm vs 183cm) to stay at a "safe" distance from Abraham while throwing jabs and straight rights all night.

    (The guys that will trouble Kessler a lot more is Ward and Dirrell. Will be very interesting to see how Kessler deals with those two. )
     
  4. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Do you know any rules beside "Pavlik rules till end of time" ? He had FIVE minutes to recover after an intentional foul, just like after a lowblow. But seeing that you are a habitual, notorious liar when it's about Abraham, you will continue to ignore shots as low that Miranda hit Abrahams THIGH who was thanks god turning away just because it suits your shitty agenda.
     
  5. Jan(DK)

    Jan(DK) Joined april 2007 Full Member

    3,454
    0
    Jun 29, 2008
    Hermit is a VERY good poster - but..... i understand your outburst !
     
  6. Flam1ngo

    Flam1ngo Member Full Member

    478
    0
    Jul 11, 2008
    At this level it's very long!
     
  7. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    now i agree that he is not enough proven , but so is kessler.
    and aa is not so overrated if you look at this poll's results.
    the overrated is kessler.
    kessler will lose against any reasonable oposition.
    even if aa is not such.
    the 168 top fighters are all unproven enough (at least not for the good)
    at a good and above level.
    no one of them have more than 1 decisive win over good opposition.
    it's a division of calzaghes and kesslers , and i do agree that calzaghe would have been still #1 there if he didn't retire.
     
  8. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    what are you talking about ?
    what does it have to do with level ?
     
  9. Jan(DK)

    Jan(DK) Joined april 2007 Full Member

    3,454
    0
    Jun 29, 2008

    Hi frankenfrank.

    Why don't you, David Fanning, Maelstroem, Mariancobretti and Dinamita make a "i hate Kessler" club. You should have a lot to talk about.

    Just remember. When ordering pizza, only ask for one :smooch
     
  10. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    :rofl:good