WARD vs KESSLER

Well here in America we place value in winning, so let's agree to disagree.

 

We have talked about whether Kessler and Ward have fought enough abroad, have met different type fighters etc. But no one has ever even thought to propose that Ward has the better resume.

That is just too absurd.

 

I see it this way: If Ward comes to fight like a man he will loose. If Ward runs like a rabbit (Leonard in Leonard vs. Hagler) he might pull off a point victory. Wards bodywork is excellent, however, Ward is doomed if Kessler can "walk" right through it. Also, Ward's bodywork will be delivered in regions that logically exposes Ward's head, leaving it open to some of Mikkels straight rights. How will Ward react to Mikkel's power shots to his chin? If Ward has a suspect chin Mikkel should definitely be the guy to show it.

 

Yes that is because I was moving on from it. Just because several biased Euros are still arguing for Kessler does not change the facts. What more can I say to a bunch of stubborn Euros?

 

hhhhmmmm, not really, your a yank i guess, a biased opinion is expected really:good

 

it just took a couple of posts to burst your bubble, and automatically the negro ghetto thug comes out of his closet:yep

you lose once again

 

admit you are a loser:deal

and voted bush

 

THAT'S WHAT THE WHOLE DAMN ARGUMENT WAS. Come on, dude. Did I throw you delusional geniuses completely off by mentioning the word resume? ****, I take it back. Forget I ever mentioned the word "resume", since I was using it in a post that was trying to move on from the subject that was being beaten to death before everybody started whining. You jackasses were discussing who had the better resume whether you knew it or not. I just thought you guys knew what resume meant.

 

Admit you want my nuts on your chin....and voted Bush.

 

And you're from England. Let me guess...you're not biased right? Still, in your objective opinion, FROCH is going to win the whole thing right? But hey, you're not being biased or anything just because Froch is the only decent undefeated fighter England has....you're being objective because Froch is the best fighter in the tournament (not even) right?

 

We could sit here and have a discussion on the subject of how tall Wladimir Klitchscko is and how tall Ivan Calderon is, but that doesn't make it 'arguable' as to who is taller.

 

im not your mother david

i guess you lose again, im up 3-0, are we slowly reaching the point, where you are about to rob the local liquer store, mr negro ghetto thug:yep

 

No my man, mom jokes do NOT put your bubblegum wrapper joke telling ass in the lead. And did it ever occur to you that white people in America, better yet California, root for black boxers? Well hey, thanks for announcing your racism anyway, beautiful. I'm sure the readers appreciate it.

 

so you are white, then it all makes sense..

hello to you, sir charlie zelenoff:yep

 

It is not arguable that your analogy is crap.