Did the 1990's have too many punchers and not enough technicians?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Sep 24, 2009.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,937
    24,863
    Jan 3, 2007
    I grew up enjoying boxing in the 1990's. There were lot's of great fights, big rivalrys, high quaility talent, and a hell of a lot of guys who could punch. But, was there an imbalance? I often wonder if a 40+ year old Larry Holmes may well have been the best technical boxer around. A little bit later Chris Byrd came along, but were we void of good boxers in the 90's?
     
  2. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I wish we had more punchers right now in the UK!

    Every show you go to....

    W PTS 6
    W PTS 8
    W PTS 4

    :zzz
     
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
    Of course. You're talking about maybe the very peak of the "bigger is better" in boxing mentality.

    Also, from the time Tyson went to prison until the time he returned, people wanted excitement in the HW division, they had come to expect it. A LOT of fighters tried to fill those shoes, that's where the money was.
     
  4. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    I'd say yes. It's sort of the opposite of the 80's, which consisted mainly of boxers and not many punchers (excepting some of course like Tyson)

    The only real technicians I'd say were Holyfield, older Holmes. Moorer possibly, I wouldn't classify Lennox as a technician although I have no qualms with someone doing so. Toward the end of the 90's you got guys like Byrd though, I think the fact that the 90's had SO MANY punchers is a big reason why we think it's one of the best.

    The 80's gets critisized a lot but I wouldn't hesitate putting the best from the 80's as in Holmes, Tyson, Spoon against anyone from the 90's. It's just the fights weren't always slugfests and obviously drugs/motivation stopped a lot of guys once they reached the summit.
     
  5. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    Holyfield was a dominant/successful technician throughout the 90's. Douglas was an excellent technician in his win over Tyson. And I would say Lewis qualifies as one in the late 90's.

    I don't think boxing is a fad driven sport. Guys don't make it to the top just because their style is popular.
     
  6. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Yes but you have Tua, Ike, Morrison, Mercer, Bowe, Foreman, Cooper, Tyson, arguably McCall and Bruno, Briggs, Sanders, Maskaev, arguably Rahman, Ruddock. The punchers greatly outnumber the technicians.
     
  7. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    True, but I was moreso going by that none(most) of those guys never made it to the top and/or became ATG's like Holyfield and Lewis did.
     
  8. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,539
    Jul 28, 2004
    There's never enough technicians, IMO..the cerebral side of boxing and why it's called the "Sweet Science".
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,539
    Jul 28, 2004
    Lewis had an alter ego as a cautious technician..