Chris Arreola vs Samuel Petters - Is Peters Much Better Than Arreola?

**** off

 

The Peters of a few years ago vs. Arreola would be a fun fight. I'm not sure what the current Peters even has anymore. This would still be a fun fight though. Who would be going backwards?

 

Poll wrong...Chris is better than Peters by far.

 

One got destroyed and Quit >>>>Peter


One got destroyed but wanted to continue after his corner stop the fight>>>>>Arreola.



A warrior's heart >>>Arreola


A quitter's heart >>>Peter

 

you put a fu**ed up pollup cuz arreola represenative himself way better and he would kick peters ass so dont diss arreola by putting this idiotic thread up! peter didnt try! chris did and even though he was dominated he did have his moments unlike peter:twisted: so fu** you to dis chris he:bbb:bbb:bbb you out !!!!!!!!

 

Peter is getting better.
Getting in shape.
He now has a jab.
Knows how to slip punches.
Arreola has nothing but his face for a target.
Peter wins by KO.

 

Nah, imo a young up and coming petters was better(more skilled and faster), but right now I think it's Arreola.

 

Peter is a quitter, Arreola is not.

 

Arreola>Peter (Any Version)

 

:think I think so too. Maybe Chris will improve.

 

its Sam PETER
not Sam PETERS
but i think Peter vs Arreolla match would be a war....their 2 styles would make for a good fight....

 

I think this needs to fight to decide, I'll take Chris over Peter. He may be fat but his cardio is top notch and he has a good punch, I think he'd take Peter into the later rounds and wear him down if Peter didn't KO in the early ones Be one hell of a fight. They would have to theme it based on Nightmares.

 

**** this stupid piece-of-**** poll.

Peter was a ****ing punching bag who didn't do jack ****. At least Arreola tried.

**** this thread and it's starter.

 

**** you.