Vitali Vs Ken Norton, Gerry Cooney

Please never post again. Thank you.

 

ewwwwww wow your in the "US" group here

go get your group to teach you how someone can punch harder over a accumulation of blowz during the course of the entire fight rather then in one or two sequential blowz you incredable boxing genious

itz simple mathmaticz of force and energy so being a baby girl even i can understand it

isnt that kewl the ****** baby girl just taught you something imagine what your "US" is going to think about you now

and to think i didnt even get started on norton and cooney

go lick your woundz and show me what you got dildo face

 

no thank you thatz quite the compliment if you really think about it

id give you one back but i havent a clue who you are

thank you

 

I think Cooney has the chin, size and power to keep Vitali smart and win a decision. Vitali just isn't that impressive to me, though his movement and fast hands were decent the other night. You have to believe that was due to the Blob (admittedly game) he was fighting.

 

latineg.............always good to see a new ******ed ****in **** on the board :good

 

now fleaman you know i would think you should be polite but i must say it does seem your observation is correct :good

 

No doubt Mr Butt

 

You're a very articulate guy!!!

 

Wow. You think Cooney wins a decision. Highly unlikely as no man in Vitlai's 40 fight career has won more than two consensus round vs him. This includes top boxer types in Lewis, Byrd, and Donald.

This is a sign as to how hard it is to out box Vitali Klitschko, and a fact that even his most harshest critics as you must grudgingly admit.

Cooney wasn't a top boxer. He had an under developed right hand, and didn't move and jab much.

By the way, Cooney had stamina related issues, Arreola has better stamina and IMO a better chin than Cooney. While Cooney hits harder for sure, he might only last half as long here.

 

vitali beats both by ko.

 

So punching power should be measured by adding up the total energy of all punches thrown over the course of the fight?

In that case, Hank Armstrong hit harder than Mike Tyson.

 

thankz brother :good :good

 

These trolls are really begining to suck... Fall must be the season for them.

 

wow your really great with this concept

if you keep going the same way your headed i bet you could create a chart that clearly demonstrated that mickey mouse hitz harder then Armstrong

have that on my desk by morning

 

Now, now--enough of that crying. It's your own logic that has landed you in this sorry mess. :nono

Throwing lots and lots of weak arm punches does not make you as hard a puncher as a guy who throws a few massive shots. If you need fifty gazillion punches to clobber your opponent, you just don't hit that hard. Sorry.

Besides, Mickey Mouse is a cartoon character. Everybody knows that they have disproportionately high workrates and hitting power. That would completely screw up my statistics.