You are funny **** buddy:rofl:rofl Actually I'm asking ULIULI is willing to bet again on PAC vs COTTO. It would be nice if he will eat his CROW again :rofl:rofl. I'm sure he wouldn't mind losing. He's gotten used to it :rofl:rofl:rofl
No it doesnt work that way. You put your rep and name on the line with this thread. You receive the **** back that you give equally. If you were modest about your opinion on this then fair enough, but you were prepared to rub it in the pac fans faces before the fight even happened, AFTER it happened guess who comes out on top? Its quite embarrasing to look at really. One of the biggest self humiliation i've seen in a forum. I dont care who has a better legacy...all subject to opinion. Those who write history will decide that , which fighter to glorify overtime...
ULIULI, You wanna BET who GOING TO WIN!? I'll go for PAC! or are you PLAYING IT SAFE THIS TIME and SIDE WITH PAC to PREVENT YOU FROM EATING YOUR CROW AGAIN!? :hey:rofl:hey What kind of bet you LIKE, Name it, 3 months, 6 months 1 yr, life TIME self imposed BAN bet! I'M WAITING FOR YOUR REPLY!!!!
:rofl:rofl:rofl What an emotional fruit! I won't bet on this one, as I am leaning towards Pac to beat Cotto. It has been well documented that I have always been skeptical about Cotto's chin, and ability to endure punishment. That said, I am not ruling Cotto to bring the pain, and I give him a chance against Pac.
It doesn't work what way, and what doesn't work which way, WTF are you gibbering about! atsch I made a thread asking, what excuses will Pacatards have IF Pac loses, not when Pac loses, but IF Pac loses, an honest question. Is english your second or third language, because if it is I understand your ignorance then. After Pac beat a weight drained corpse I gave you *******s enough time to celebrate, but your dumbasses started ranking Pac over Whitaker, Chavez, Leonard, Duran, Hearns, DLH, Sanchez, Gomez and many more. So I came and schooled you guys in a thread snell made. I'll bump it so you can read it at your request. Hell, even in this thread, if you go page by page, the ignorance spewed by *******s is pathetic. I don't really understand where you're coming from, my self esteem is not as bad as yors probably to feel humiliated for asking an honest question.... What is humiliating is a ******* trying to talk boxing when he absoloutely knows JACK **** about boxing. What's humiliating is a ******* claiming Pac to be the GOAT :rofl, or to even be ranked top 5, 10, or even 20!!! What's humiliating is saying Pac would beat PW using Quintana as a measuring stick , what's embarrassing is saying ATG like Duran, Chavez, Whitaker, Leonard would be KO by Pac. That is TRULY EMBARRASSING, and just plain PATHETIC. I already put my case, and a damn good one at that. You guys made a SORRY ATTEMPT to refute it, but like most of you're nicknames, you guys FAILED. Don't come hear trying to school someone whose been following boxing for more than a decade before Pac came on the scene, when you yourself came probably 3 years after Pac came on the scene, you'll get chewed and spit out everytime. Live and learn baby.
Perhaps you can just let them borrow one of the many excuses you've produced for your fishnet hero ASSOL...
Ahh! YOU LEARNED YOUR LESSON! I was thinking that if you bet on COTTO, it would be interesting for you to eat your CROW and your **** :rofllol:
***ot asswipe uli is getting all the manlove he's always craving and the troll ***** is actually loving it..:yep
This content is protected - This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected vs This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected You really fail to realize that Whitaker is leagues above Morales and Quartey is leagues above Larios, especially the Morales Pac fought, infact, Pac lost to a past prime, shot Morales, that has to be taken into consideration. Also Larios was way past his best and Quartey was in his prime. That is a fact. A Prime Oscar towers over Morales and Larios, especially the one that Pac fought and lost too. It's an undenialble fact that Morales lost to a past prime Barrera, and journey man Zahir Raheem before Pac was able to beat him. Yeah, I'll look. I'll also look at where Mosley ranks right now, and how he looks compared to the ODLH that Pac beat. As for Hatton-Vargas, Vargas is leagues above Hatton, Vargas was naturally bigger than ODLH, and on steroids! Vargas' skills are leagues above Hatton's. Hatton makes Vargas look like Sugar Ray Leonard. If you'd understand boxing, you wouldn't fail to realize why Vargas and Mosley in 2003 were harder fights that 2008 ODLH and 2009 Hatton. That's how I know you're ignorant to boxing. Oscar moved up to fight Whitaker (P4P#2), Castillejo (WBC champ), Vargas was bigger, Trinidad was bigger, Mosley on roids was bigger, Miguel Angel Gonzalez was bigger, Ruelas was actually bigger, and Hopkins and Sturm were far beyond just bigger. Oscar took on the best all the time, that is something Pac CANNOT say (ALL THE TIME). You truly never saw Oscar in his prime did you? A Prime Oscar was faster, his handspeed was compared to the Sugars, and his POP was devastating. Hell, their KO % is about the same, the main difference being that ODLH fought much better opposition that Pac. IM WAITING This content is protected Lets do this! The Barrera that Pac fought had been pro 14 years had 3 losses, two in which he was brutally f-ed up and one where he took a sever beating while dishing one out, and 57-3-0. That's three beatings. Pernell was 12.5 years pro and should have been 40-0-0, p4p #2. Chavez was 12.5 years pro, was 96-1-1 Should have been 96-2. But had never had a beating like Barrera. ODLH moved up from 140 to fight the Whitaker at 147. ODLH had one fight at 140 before fighting Chavez at 140 who already had a whoppong 8 fights under his belt at Jr. WW. Pacquaio has fought Diaz, ODLH, Hatton after MAB and EM. ODLH fought Vargas, Mayorga, Hopkins, Mosley, Trinidad, Gatti, Castillejo and Quartey after JCC and Pea. I don't see your argument anymore. This content is protected In part I'm glad you realize and admit Morales was shot. Secondly, Whitaker was NOT coming off a humiliating loss a la Morales. Infact Whitaker should have been undefeated coming into the fight with DLH and had had some impressive wins vs great opposition in his previous fights. Unfortunately Whitaker didn't deal well with the loss, got on the junk and ruined the rest of his career with drugs. Let me school you on something. Shotness is not necessarily and always attributed to age. Size is not always attributed to height. You know Whiatker had beat JCV years before he lost to DLH, JCV the man that decked Winky Wright 5 times. ODLH moved up to 147, a weight he was unfamiliar with to fight the reigning champ. :rofl:rofl:rofl No you just didn't say that! First Quartey was in the PRIME of his LIFE, Larios was PAST his prime, Quartey was undefeated, and had one of the best jabs of his era. Larios was a good B level fighter in his prime. Quartey had an iffy fight where he should have won easy, but because of Kds he ended up getting a questionable draw. His previous win was a little over a year and a half. A Shane was on steroids was was clearly the stronger man that night. Oscar was clearly the smarter man. You still didn't prove why EM was a better win than Whitaker, Mab a better win than JCC, Hatton a better win than Vargas. So DLH has a few losses at the twighlight of his career, Pac has some in the beggining. It is very common for great fighters to rack up a few loses towards the end. All you did was TRY to dissect ODLH resume, very uneffectively, but never even mentioned Pac's. You can dissect ODLH's resume all you want, but it's still better than Pac's. This content is protected WTF??! Do you even follow boxing? Sure DLH had youth on his side, but how many times have we seen skill beat Speed?? HUNDREDS. Morales had been fighting pro for 13 years when Pac finally beat him, had been in a several grueling wars and was obviously at the end of his career. Past his BEST, and arguably SHOT. Morales was not even a titlist, he wasn't even P4P, hell, out of Morales' last 6 fights he only won one, his hast hurrah vs Pac. GREAT indicator of shotness. JCC had been pro for 12.5 years when DLH beat him, had one loss and a nice winning streak since, was the WBC champion and considred P4P. He still continued winning after with the exception of the DLH rematch. You're F-ing insane if you think Morales was a better win. How much does it matter??? Better question is how many ass kickings, or how many brutal wars that take something out of you was JCC in compared to MAB?? MAB was always and will always be inferior ro JCC. And ON TOP of that, MAB and EM do not even come close to JCC's skill level. Mab and EM are probably the best MX of the early 2000's, but nowhere near JCC on the ATG...As you familiarize yourself more with boxing you'll understand it more.