The Klit family has two boxers better than PBF. How the hell can he be P4P #1 when he would be third best in their family? 1. The Klit's defence is equally as good as PBF's. Watch their fights, they do not get hit either. 2. Their power, offense and punch output is much better, look at their KO ratio and the statistics on their fights. 3. Wlad's chin may be a touch worse than PBF, we are not sure since PBF was only stunned by Corley and touched the canvas with his glove against Zab, but Vitali's chin is much better. 4. The Klit's fight the best boxer's in their division, PBF does not.
I personally think floyd is more efficient then the klitscko's....and is a better counter-puncher then either klitschko....I would pick floyd as the better overall boxer, plus he has demonstrated his skills against better opposition...
I don't agree, but any thread that gets the Mayweather huggers agitated is all right with me. :good :yep Now I'm just gonna sit back and enjoy the show. :smoke
the TS has a point...the klits are underrated, maybe because they're not americans and dont talk ****... lets compare vitali and floyds last 3 fights... vitali - sam peters, juan gomez, chris arreola(all total domination) floyd - DLH(SD), Hatton(dominated 2nd half of the fight), JMM(dominated 12rnds) vitali fought top contenders in HW, while not one of floyds opponent were WW...I wonder why floyd is P4P#2 while vitali is not even in the top 10...bias much???