Exactly.... Mayweather would win with a serious amount of ease.... Hu ever made this is either stupid or seriouly bias towards hatton :roll:
Absolutely the most intelligent and correct contribution on this site which is full of stupidity.Well said,jimmie.
Floyd beats ricky the same way no matter what.. Ricky turned down a fight with floyd at 140 cuz he wasn't ready or some bull****...floyd tko 10.. This fight already took place in 2007 and we saw how it ended....hatton was 43-0 and was a solid top 10lb 4 lb fighter in the world...the man has 2 ls both to the best n the world....
I hope the whole esb community wakes up and realizes you are trollin and stop replyin your stupid threads. You talk about Hatton as a god then dismiss Marquez what an ******* you are I can only hope you're not serious when talking that mess. This is the second (maybe more I might have missed some) troll thread you post this week the other one being the stupid 'Prime Haye vs Prime Tyson who wins?'
to the thread starter, you must be a hatton fan to think there would be any difference at 140. wieght had nothing to do with mayweather knocking out hatton. mayweather is simply way better. they could fight at 135,140,147,154 or any other weight, hatton never beats mayweather.
Not at all, I think the umpire Cortez wa sthe difference maker, and the fact it was 147 and Hattons best years were behind him hatton had Mayweather all over the shop, nearly Ko'ing him in the first 3 rounds, Cortez wrecked it, and made it a mismatch, i mean yeah Hatton did a billion times better than Marquez, but Mayweather was frightened at first, once Cortez deducted that point, Hatton lost it. a 25yr old Hatton with a fair umpire would have beaten that Mayweather at 140lbs. If Hatton hadn't boozed his whole life and kept himself in shape and not been a slob, he'd probably have won too.