Why Salita and not Murray?

i'm talking about his level of ability all u need to know about that is in his boxrec rankings not even inside the top 50 a

 

:good Its about time someone said it.

 

i'm not here defending murray but i reckon he'd smash khan

 

But the WBA mandatory challenger....I still don't get your point. Khan fights Salita or he has to dump the strap, how is that Khans problem, he can only fight who is put in front of him. The fight after Salita will tell us all we need to know about Khans intentions

 

But you reckon every boxer can smash Khan? whats new?

 

John Murray is a plod forward, hands up fighter (a very poor mans Kotelnik), Khan or anyone with a bit of movement would beat John Murray

 

Murray is still having nightmares of Munguia, need not worry about smashing Khan.

 

So you think that Khan should take on Murray for honour, because to be honest he brings **** all to the table. There is one easy solution to this...let John Murray move up to LW and gain the mandatory slot, easy:deal

 

I am not bashing Murray. Murray is 28 fights into his career and has only just got around to fighting an old old timer and shot fighter like Thaxton and that was considered a step up. When Murray actually does something against a fighter above domestic standard then he can claim he is a valid opponent to Khan. Murray has been so very far behind Khan in his career progression that the fight has never looked ok.

 

More use of Murray to bash Khan :roll:

Think of something new please.......

N.B - keep chins out of it :good

 

Munguia, a fighter who showed what he was made of before and after he faced Murray

 

Murray is now flavour of the month, last month it was Thaxton until everyone realised he was shot to ****...this **** will never stop

 

Warren's wand is more than magic, it's ****ing psychic if he managed to have Salita made mandatory contender last December just so Khan could have an easy fight now! :rofl