Was David Haye Undisputed Cruiserweight Champion? Please vote!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Losfer_Words, Oct 4, 2009.

  1. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,762
    Likes Received:
    2
    Another red herring. It's undisputed champion. So only other champions dispute your claim to be champion of the world.

    As Cobbler says, there are so many belts now it's become impossible to achieve and therefore irrelevant. But that's what it means.
     
  2. KERRZO

    KERRZO Glass Jaw Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    999
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,318
    Likes Received:
    2
    He did hold all the belts (although not the IBF at the same time as the others) and beat the best out there on their own turf.

    You can argue the technicalities all day if you like but thats really just nitpicking.

    To all intents and purposes Haye was regarded by most as the undisputed champion.
     
  4. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    4,387
    Likes Received:
    2
    Considering Bell never lost the IBF belt in the ring, Mormeck & Haye had a greater claim to it than Cunnigham.
     
  5. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    25,495
    Likes Received:
    2,176

    But even so, we have never had an Undisupted World Champion, because someone will always dispute a claim...
     
  6. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,762
    Likes Received:
    2
    No, the origins of the undisputed term in this context come from having 2 governing bodies. Hence who the 'champion' is was in dispute.

    Not the same as having challengers.
     
  7. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,762
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's at this point I'm giving up

    It couldn't be more black and white, he didn't own all the belts, hence he wasn't

    If people can't distinguish between 'undisputed' and 'widely regarded as,' that's their problem lol
     
  8. indie_uk1

    indie_uk1 Kong is King Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    Judging by Kerzo's picture i think we can alla gree that he was undisputed chammpion

    **** the ibf title! Job done , argument over.....
     
  9. put that in your pipe and smoke it! :good
     
  10. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    19,216
    Likes Received:
    2
    So you are, if I understand, going for the literal interpretation that someone is not undisputed if there is someone else holding something that calls itself a world title? Ie. Hopkins would not have been considered undisputed even after beating De La Hoya, because Eugenio Monteiro held the WBU 'World Title'. Whereas others would have considered Hopkins 'undisputed champion' even before he added the WBO title to the three he already held...
     
  11. what a loada cobblers, if you don't mind me saying :good
     
  12. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    19,216
    Likes Received:
    2
    Are you still here? Planning to actually contribute anything to the forum at any point?
     
  13. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,919
    Likes Received:
    2
    It really does discombobulate my brain that this is still raging on.

    Haye did not hold the IBF ergo he was not undisputed.

    Close thread.
     
  14. no pun intended