Sorry for having an opinion you *****. It's got stitch up written all over it. Dont you get tired of seeing the Hatton's as perfect?
Why has it got stitch up written all over it you *****? The problem with convincing yourself that the fix is in beforehand without any real reason is that after the fight you'll be calling the decision bad even if its close call, blaming the ref for his handling of it or finding some other way to make your half-arsed "prediction" correct.
I just believe that in England under Hatton promotions Matthew Hatton will get a decision over an ageing fighter with a lot of loses and basically no future in the sport even if he gets whooped. Thats all. I know any criticism of a Hatton seems to hurt you really bad (Are you Ray Hatton?) but its just an opinion. Theres no need to cry about it. And you have absolutely no clue what i'll be doing after the fight, what were you saying about "half arsed predictions"?
Who's crying? I couldn't give monkies about this fight (other than whinging ****ers cluttering up forums about it) I just think you should at least have some reason before you accuse someone of corruption, its not a Hatton issue...it would be the same it we were talking about Warren. At least my prediction has a history of happening around here, its quite a common occurance. You're accusing a promoter with no record of fight fixing whatsoever and 3 judges who havn't even been ****ing named yet...atsch
Hahaha ****ing hell, how defensive do you get of the Hattons? Im cringing here, seriously. I havent accused dear little Ricky of handing over a wad of cash to the judges, I havent even hinted at anything of the sort. I'm not accusing anyone of fixing a fight, the judges or Hatton. Get a ****ing grip of yourself.
it does indeed reek of a stitch-up.....something along the lines of his big brother's 'fight' against Tszyu. That's what this is remeniscent of, and on that basis we have to bet on baldy at the prices available. It's a joke fight by a joke promoter.
You havn't hinted at it? Complete Bull****. If you havn't even got the bottle to stand by your opinions then whats the point in posting them in the first place? The claim that Hatton only has to stay on his feet to be guaranteed a win certainly seems like you're (more than) hinting at corruption? Or is it just a lame attempt to appear worldly wise and "in the know"?
****ing hell lad, I exaggerated a bit. I think if Hatton loses 8-4 or 7-5 in rounds he'll still get the decision, is that better? I didnt realise you have to write everything on here exactly 100% detailed because theres picky ****s like yourself about. I'll be more careful in future. Do you think all fights in Germany are judged perfectly and fairly? No? It can happen in England aswell you know. You're one of these who just loves taking the moral highground behind a computer screen arent you? In others words - a complete coward who needs to feel powerful as you're nothing in the outside world.
Of course it can happen in England, it can happen anywhere. Sorry for reading your post and taking it at face value, now I know you're prone to exageration I'll make allowances. Who's crying now? Theres no need for the psycho-evaluation, you really are reading too much into this now. Relax. Deep breaths.....
Did you seriously think I was thinking Ndou would lose if he knocked him down three times and won all 12 rounds? A bit of common sense, its obvious a 38 year old Ndou isnt going to be able to do loads in every round to guarantee that hence if Hatton gets through it I think he'll get the decision. Its not like he's fighting Pacquiao and ive said all he has to do is get through it. You're happy to accuse me of saying a fight is fixed when I never so I'll accuse you of whatever I like in return. If I comment on a Hatton in future, please just ignore me, I cant be doing with you being a baby everytime, though 14k of your posts is probably Hatton arselicking and jumping to conclusions so I wont hold my breath on that score.
I think you'll find my posts are reasonably evenly spead subject-wise. But, hey, don't let that stop you making up more "opinions" and exagerations. I've asked you to justify post and you backtracked. No harm done, try not to sulk eh?
don't mind Gaz, he's alright but he's a bit anal and masively blinkered when it comes to assessing the Hattons and their ways.