The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

im afraid thats not true.

If mayweather beats pac, everyone will say he needs to fight mosley. Some have already begun to believe that Pac is not the real test no more mosley is.

Its amazing what 1 victory can do for you.

When mosley lost to cotto and struggled with mayorga, it was mosley is shot and over the hill.

After the margarito fight look what happened.

 

your making sense, to bad the *******s cant read very well.

 

All pac's rematches happened way before floyd retiredatsch:

 

Slow and old in reference to Floyd... If you want the whole story, here it is... JMM is slower, older, smaller, weaker, shorter reach, lighter, lesser skilled boxer compared to Floyd...:rofl:rofl

But JMM was still able to hit Floyd...:rofl:rofl
.

 

true true, also floyd offered shane fight in 2005, shane turned him down, then flyod fought hatton on 2007 who every one said hatton was gonna kill him, then floyd retired so how is floyd ducking Shane if he never had the chance to fight shane. floyd haters are just the worst haterz to have, and its even worse when you get *******s who dont know jack about boxing blabbing on.

 

A lightweight guy who was p4p number 2 at the time. And has just finished knocking out Diaz and Cassamayor who had never been knocked out.

seems like a nice tune up fight to me. What ever you say it clearly was a better fight than fighting an Alfonzo Gomez or a michael Jennings as a tune up fight.

I wonder if Mayweather V Jennings would have done 1m ppv buys:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

"LOL

Im gonna hold you to that

Out of curiousity which fight would you most like to see."

hmmm, thing is they all bring a threat, whether it be speed, power, an iron chin or reach. if you are walking around claiming you are the bees ****ing knees, you gotta back it up. assess any hall of fame boxers career, they back up their talk by taking on the absolute best in the division(win or lose).

personally, if he faced mosley, or the winner of pac vs cotto, it would shut me up.

 

I think Castillo is just giving an honest fair assessment... Nacho Berestain has so much vested interest in JMM... He's the trainer of JMM... He's like a father to JMM.... But Nacho was not hiding anything when he said JMM has only 40% chance to defeat Floyd... Nacho was just honest in saying JMM doesn't have the speed to defeat Floyd...

Sometimes people do talk honestly... unlike most people here...:rofl:rofl
.

 

well, jmm was skilled enough to give pacman troubles alot infact, so what floyd has done to jmm he will do even worse to pacman, as jmm is counterpucnher and countered pacman all night, and floyd out boxed, and out smarted jmm, what will he do to pacman. floyd will give pacman a boxing lesson and just make him look like a rookie. i am not using boxing triangle to justify that floyd will win over pacman (that doesnt work), but pacman defense is terrible (jmm countered him like crazy), so some like floyd will just outsmart pacman, and that reason why roach has been coming out with new comments like "we dont need floyd" but when floyd was retired he was talking all sorts of stuff about him now floyd is ready roach and arum will pussyout. using your words its easy to say that floyd will skool pacman in a fight.

 

"LOL

Im gonna hold you to that

Out of curiousity which fight would you most like to see."

hmmm, thing is they all bring a threat, whether it be speed, power, an iron chin or reach. if you are walking around claiming you are the bees ****ing knees, you gotta back it up. asess any hall of fame boxers career, they back up their talk by taking on the absolute best in the division(win or lose).

personally, if he faced mosley, or the winner of pac vs cotto, it would shut me up even if he lost.

 

hmm, thats just complete bs, dont you think castillo may still be sour about his defeat to floyd and before you start blabbing on about how castillo was robbed and me making you look like a ****, isnt that the reason why castillo will say pacman is better cuz he is still pissed about having loss over floyd. boxer have big egos (in a good way) and when they loose there ego goes down and hate emerges for that fighter that gave them the loss.

 

You're only dreaming... Yours is all pure assumption...

At least Castillo was able to fight/spar both PAC and Floyd...
.

 

And he'll probly say that Hatton is faster and stronger as well after the whoppin he got from him. People realize that this comes from an old man!!! peace out

 

lol, that was not assumption ive told you why floyd will win, and using your owns words to prove it, you got owned and you now it. its not only me who thinks floyd will whoop pacmans ass, why is it that arum and especially roach have starting saying crap like "we dont need pacman" and when clearly they do as the p4p former has comeback and we all want to see pacman vs floyd, and this time its not floyd that gonna duck but pacmans trainer and promotor know flyod will own him so will do whatever they can to not take the fight. arum recently said floyd should fight someone else not pacman why even he knows that pacman will get owned. this is coming from a boxing fan who like both pacman and floyd but the end of the story is floyd would be too good for pacman.

 

Why would Castillo need to do that when it's clearly proven that PAC is faster and stronger than Hatton...:rofl:rofl
.