I honestly believe that on his night, fighting to the best of his capabilities in all aspects and with the right game plan that he sticks to and uses well and intelligently, I believe that Tyson wins against anyone put in front of him from all era's. I honestly do. You might think I'm mad, or don't know what I'm talking about but that guy had something special and his pure animal instinct could carry him through most punishment on his night. Haye is good and entertaining but Tyson at his best is in a different galaxy. Maybe Haye would have me thinking differently if he had taken and beaten Kit but we'll never know now.
Haye Slips from the liquid that excretes from his rear canal but on his way down gets clipped by a right hand that stiffins his torso for 30 minutes....ugly this
:blood :nut again define how it is racism when more people vote on one person then another of the same race....
Haye ko's Tyson in the 4th round, then quits boxing to become UN Secretary General and brings about world peace.
A shot Tyson took dozens of combos from Holyfield. And a prime Tyson would not be able to withstand a punch from Haye? Please, GTFO.
Haye would have **** running down his leg during the introductions then pull a Seldon once the bell rang.
You obviously like Haye and thats cool but dude when you make posts like this you lose all credabilty as a knowledgable fight fan. It's okay to root for your guy but damn be realistic.:huh
dude you are trippin your balls off? first of all how do we know what Haye's prime is? Second, he's never fought people of this caliber. Until Haye mans up, don't bring his name into these type discussions
Are you serious. Tyson would take more punishment than Haye could dish out. The man had a great chin.
Haye is nowhere near prime Tyson's speed and their styles are 180 degrees in the opposite direction. Mike ends David's career within the first couple rounds. :verysad
If you're going to make a mess of Tyson's loss to Douglas, then what of Haye's loss to the biggest nobody who ever lived? I swear.. even worse than the dual-*******/Floyturd commonality of trying to one sidedly compare one party's performance against a fighter that the other already fought, while explicitly disregarding any inconsistencies with their viewpoint, the situation, or that the fighters' may have faced for a number of reasons. Ah, ah, right, pardon me, then. I'm naturally failing to see the parabel you're parlaying unto us with your great boxing wisdom, devoid of any bias whatsoever. As Hasim Rahman once beat Lennox Lewis, that surely means that he can also knockout David Tua. Obviously.