Unbelievable scoring... Are you telling me Dirrell lost 7 rounds!?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by PrideOfWales, Oct 17, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    No way man... absolute horse-**** scoring.

    I agree with the point taken off and was frustrated with Dirrell's bitching and complaining but he made Froch look dire.

    He landing pretty much all the meaningful punches, great counterpunching.

    Very disappointing scoring.
     
    PrideOfWales, Oct 17, 2009
    PrideOfWales, Oct 17, 2009
    #1
  2. griff

    griff WOODDDDDDDYA Full Member

    5,548
    0
    Dec 14, 2006
    Dirrell won the fight with landing the cleaner punches, Froch got lucky tonight.
     
    griff, Oct 17, 2009
    griff, Oct 17, 2009
    #2
  3. Healy

    Healy Former Wee Poof

    3,196
    0
    Feb 13, 2006
    I dont know if Dirrell got hit 7 times, never mind lost 7 rounds

    He clearly won. Had it 9 rounds to 3, i gave Froch the first when it could have being scored level too.

    Very one sided fight in fovour of Dirrell
     
    Healy, Oct 17, 2009
    Healy, Oct 17, 2009
    #3
  4. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,552
    8,720
    Apr 25, 2008
    I had Dirrel winning by three points and that is with the point deduction which i think was harsh and also being fair and probably slightly biased towards Froch.
     
    Jacko, Oct 17, 2009
    Jacko, Oct 17, 2009
    #4
  5. Ischbaad

    Ischbaad Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    Dirrell won it clearly.
     
    Ischbaad, Oct 17, 2009
    Ischbaad, Oct 17, 2009
    #5
  6. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Dirrell won the fight.

    The scoring was an embarrassment.
     
    JonOli, Oct 17, 2009
    JonOli, Oct 17, 2009
    #6
  7. Hayter

    Hayter New Member Full Member

    56
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    I had it 115-112 to Froch. So two judges were spot on.
     
    Hayter, Oct 17, 2009
    Hayter, Oct 17, 2009
    #7
  8. PatrickP

    PatrickP Active Member Full Member

    1,064
    0
    Jul 13, 2009
    Well **** off down to specsavers so cos Froch barely won a round in reality. He is a cheating, dirty fighter too. ****er should have been disqualified for punching to the back of the head all through the fight. That was bent judging of the highest order:twisted:
     
    PatrickP, Oct 17, 2009
    PatrickP, Oct 17, 2009
    #8
  9. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    I guess we are the new Germans, maybe Ottke would like to make his comeback over here.
     
    JonOli, Oct 17, 2009
    JonOli, Oct 17, 2009
    #9
  10. safe_pa

    safe_pa Howlin' Mad Full Member

    1,919
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    **** :twisted:
     
    safe_pa, Oct 17, 2009
    safe_pa, Oct 17, 2009
    #10
  11. Hayter

    Hayter New Member Full Member

    56
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    And it's about time too! The home town champ should always get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the close rounds and there were at least seven very close rounds in the fight.

    Junior Witter should have got the decision against Bradley too.
     
    Hayter, Oct 17, 2009
    Hayter, Oct 17, 2009
    #11
  12. mryeags

    mryeags Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,588
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    I had it £1500 from bet365 ...so dumsey dumsey mate ! .....:rofl...laffin all the way to the bank ..... Dirrell should realise he can run but he cant hide ...
     
    mryeags, Oct 17, 2009
    mryeags, Oct 17, 2009
    #12
  13. PatrickP

    PatrickP Active Member Full Member

    1,064
    0
    Jul 13, 2009
    Good for you but Froch lost that fight and was exposed in the worst way in front of his home crowd and you all know it.
    Any chance Froch had of getting a decent fanbase behind him has flown out the window, especially after that classless post fight interview.
     
    PatrickP, Oct 17, 2009
    PatrickP, Oct 17, 2009
    #13
  14. mryeags

    mryeags Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,588
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    If Dirrell had fought with more aggression in the first 5 rounds then i would be a few hundred out of pocket now but he was way too defensive....
    Froch was hunting him down through those rounds and evrytime he was in range Dirrell chose the ballroom dancing route to win the fight ....
    I wonder how chinny this guy is as i think hes been down a bit in sparing and this was his game plan to keep out of frochs range !
     
    mryeags, Oct 17, 2009
    mryeags, Oct 17, 2009
    #14
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Had it to Dirrell - 9-3 + Dirrells deduction
     
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3