Post Your Scorecards Of Froch-Dirrell....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009.


Page 3 of 7
  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    you called round 10 level but scored it 10-9 for Dirrell
     
    PH|LLA, Oct 17, 2009
    PH|LLA, Oct 17, 2009
    #31
  2. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    I will never understand people that say: A round was hard to score, "It was a close round"...but then give a 10-9 round to a fighter.

    Thats stupid.

    I ALWAYS score this way: If NO fighter separates himself as a clear winner of the round and its close...ITS AN EVEN ROUND....SIMPLE AND PLAIN. If its a close round with little activity, I score it 9-9. But if its a close round with FIREWORKS...I score it 10-10. I only give a fighter a round if he clearly WINS the round or Knockdown.

    With that being said: 113-112 (with one point deduction for Direll).
     
    darryl1914, Oct 17, 2009
    darryl1914, Oct 17, 2009
    #32
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    278
    Jul 22, 2004
    Sounds like u were scoring punches that missed, Froch wasnt landing when Dirrell was on the ropes for the most part
     
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    #33
  4. hitman_hatton1

    hitman_hatton1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,733
    6
    Jul 19, 2004
    7-4-1 even for dirrell.
     
    hitman_hatton1, Oct 17, 2009
    hitman_hatton1, Oct 17, 2009
    #34
  5. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    :lol::lol::lol: WRONG! i'm an american....this was no robbery unlike paulie-diaz...where the scores were off the map compared to the actual fight, I have no problems with some scoring 114-113 dirrell, but anything more then that is blind.....paulie beat baby bull**** 116-112.....froch won the rounds landing the cleaner punches in almost all the ugly brawling type rounds with the exception of round 11 that was a brawling round...froch won 114-113...
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #35
  6. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member banned Full Member

    30,117
    7,046
    May 18, 2006
    114-113 Froch.
     
    PIPO23, Oct 17, 2009
    PIPO23, Oct 17, 2009
    #36
  7. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    I disagree, I thought the froch jab backed him in and caught him many many times with rights, why do you think dirrell was holding after even semi-punches froch threw landed, because it was a connect...anytime dirrell circled and boxed a majority of the round he won that round, and IMO he only did that in 5...
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #37
  8. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    CF-AD

    1. 10-9
    This content is protected

    2. 10-9
    This content is protected

    3. 10-9 AD
    4. ad
    5. ad
    6.
    This content is protected
    ?
    7.
    This content is protected

    8. ad (close)
    9.
    This content is protected

    10 ad round, cf stung point from ad
    11 ad
    12
    This content is protected
    ?

    This content is protected
    , includes point deducted from AD
     
    paulfv, Oct 17, 2009
    paulfv, Oct 17, 2009
    #38
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    278
    Jul 22, 2004
    Direll was holding so Froch couldnt land in close after he'd thrown and landed his own shots, like Ruiz jabs and grabs, not pretty but stops him getting hit. LMAO at 'caught him many times with rights' he landed less than a handful all fight.
     
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Oct 17, 2009
    #39
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    Bingo, that's illegal, reason for the point deduction, but he did it as well anytime froch caught him....the holding by dirrell was a horrendous....
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #40
  11. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    You know Jeff young i thought you might be a knowledgable boxing fan,and that we might have just had a differance of opinion on the Diaz -Malifaggi fight,but now im convinced you are a no nothing wanna be newbie boxing fan,that probably started watching boxing a few years ago!
     
    anarci, Oct 17, 2009
    anarci, Oct 17, 2009
    #41
  12. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    People who think Froch won the last round :rofl:rofl :lol::lol:
     
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    #42
  13. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    kid, your the one that had it 117-110 dirrell, get lost buddy...:hi:
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #43
  14. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    Like Andre Dirrell?
     
    The Kurgan, Oct 17, 2009
    The Kurgan, Oct 17, 2009
    #44
  15. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    Yeah he said in the post-fight he gave the 12th away...I thought froch took the majority of the round, especially the last half...
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #45
Page 3 of 7