Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

CO-SIGN ON THIS...:good

 

Don't talk out of your hole,Dirrell was warned 7 times about holding before the point deduction.atsch

 

Froch made Mayorga look like Hopkins tonight .Any blind could have saw who won that fight .Really what did Froch do to even look like a winner ..His foot work was busch league ! He was getting tagged at will by Dirrell with streight punches ..Sad man to start off rd 1 with a horrible decision like this ..

 

I love when the common sense brigade comes through.

 

edit

 

tell that to the thousands of people that are calling froch's victory BS, im just ONE of them lol

 

Maybe we had a bad view from where we were sat ? I'm not even going to entertain this witch hunt except to say,to win a fight you have to fight. Nice meeting you tonight mate. :good

 

OK AND U DONT HAVE TO THROW PEOPLE ON THE GROUND IN A BOXING MATCH..THE NAME OF THE SPORT IS BOXING AND THEIR ARE POINTS TO BE ONE..JUSS CUZ U DONT ****IN STAND AND TRADE CUZ U KNOW THE OTHER GUY IS STRONGER DONT MEAN U CANT BOX AND MOVE AND WIN THE FIGHT..GET IT RIGHT MAN ITS BOXING AND NOT TOE TO TOE:deal

 

Haha, bit late, but I had to see what was being said, its even worse than I expected! Some scored it 117-110 to Dirrell, dunno how that works!

 

I guess I should never watch boxing again. To me, Froch won. He made Dirrell run away from him for the majority of the bout. He made Dirrell clinch whenever he got close. Dirrell also fell over a few times with very little provocation, and they weren't all slips or pushes. If you go to ground to avoid further punishment, should the referee not give you a count?

 

Usually agree with you fellow sur cali but Dirrell hurt him twice and he got robbed big time,and i usually like the guys who force the fight but Froch was uneffective and was only hitting air. Horrible Decision!!

 

Froch, courtesy of a dubious points deduction.​

 

I AGREE WIT YA MAN! HORRIBLE DECISION..I THOUGHT DIRRELL WON IT TOO!:good

 

You guys that are saying that Froch won, barring the trolls, are pointing at what Dirrell did or did not do but most of you are not saying what Froch did to win the fight.

 

I thought that Dirrell won the fight, it wasnt a robbery level dec but Dirrell clearly won the fight.

The reason that I think it wasnt a robbery was there were a couple of rounds in which nothing happened that could have gone either way.

A couple of more fights like that and nothing will be solved by this thing.