Cant believe what I am reading

In terms of Dirrell. I hoenstly feel bad for the guy. I was soo impressed with his skills. I mean he should have won that fight but I can totally see the WBC appointed judges looking at the way he was sprinting and holding and thinking "man were gonna give the tittle to this guy?". Honestly Froch had it right you can't come into a fight and try to thief a tittle the way he did. I had Dirrell up by a couple of rounds and he should have been given the descision but he didn't really work up the courage to stay flat more footed and stand on his punches until the late in the fight and then he went and gave the last round away when his corner new he needed a big round. Need to be brought along differently and now he has a montain to cimb against AA who won't easy to hit.

 

What exactly did you score the fight for Froch on? coming foward is not a criteria, he landed like 5 clean shots in the entire fight. The British commentators who are extremely biased had him losing, that was with a point deduction to, what does that tell you about your ability to score a fight?

Froch was not effective with the scoring criteria, Dirrell was, its that simple.

If one guy gets hit in the face more than the other guy on a round by round basis he wins the fight, its rather simplistic and im sorry but only a moron would of scored that fight to Froch, let alone score it that one sided.

 

just out of curriosity how did the ShowTime crew have the fight?

 

117-111 Dirrell, and that's with one even round. The scorecards were atrocious, imo.

 

Those must of been those lefts he threw while he was holding Dirrell.

 

Froch landed a few good ones but Dirrell had many shots landing and sure deserved the win !

 

For real man what the **** fight did this idiot see? I predicted a Froch win but after actually WATCHING the fight, Dirrell looked like the champion. Froch looked pathetic, and even more so with his cocky classless interview after the fight. What a shame

 

A fighter not screaming that they were robbed is supposed to indicate they feel they may have lost?

 

I have no problem with Froch, and I love his will to win, but he lost tonight.

 

This really reminds me of the first Whitaker-Ramierez (think thats what it was) fight. Where Whitaker went to France and lost a debated descision to the champion because he wasn't positive enough. He learned his leason, changed his game and the rest is history. Hope Dirrell can use this as an example of how he can move forward. But he's locked into this tournament so he'll need to learn that fast.

 

U mean when dirrell clinched froch and froch managed to wrangle free a hand and actually try to fight while dirrell just plodded him into the ropes?

Because thats what ****ing happend! Carl was trying to fight, not ****ing clinch. I dont see how anyone can be mad at him for getting a hand free and actually trying to go for it :-(

 

Everybody is thinking the same thing about your scorecard.. Haha!:rofl Dirrell clearly won that fight..