WHO WON THE FROCH-DIRRELL FIGHT? Vote & either post your scorecard or explain why...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Oct 18, 2009.

Page 2 of 5
  1. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    44,390
    Likes Received:
    6
    I didnt write down my score round, However I did have Dirrell ahead I think I had it 7 rounds to 5, either way Dirrells style is not one that I like so for most of you who know me and the style I like, to say Dirrell won here means well he was robbed.
     
    Bazooka, Oct 18, 2009
    #16
  2. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sorry ocelot but If you look at what I said, I was saying that dirrell got robbed and won the fight easily
     
    lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009
    #17
  3. M.Alexander

    M.Alexander Tough Mofo Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    116-112 Dirrel

    ROBBERY!!!!
     
    M.Alexander, Oct 18, 2009
    #18
  4. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Blah blah blah

    It was a close fight that could have gone either way but for me Dirrell was too negative, when he opened up he was impressive but it was rare that he did and he did to much holding, running, complaining, falling down, so Froch gets my vote :deal
     
    MickeyBlueEyess, Oct 18, 2009
    #19
  5. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dirrell won.. but in all honesty the 1st 2 rounds there was nothing in it.. So I don't know how you can score them in someones favour..
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #20
  6. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    Right. I was a agreeing with you.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #21
  7. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    He hit Froch in the face a lot more than Froch hit him. That simple.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #22
  8. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    At the end of the day Dirrells negativity went against him, if he had opened up like he did in the last couple of rounds he could off beat Froch easily, but he didnt, hopefully he wont be so gunshy against Abraham but i actually see him being more negative in that fight due to Abrahams power.
     
    MickeyBlueEyess, Oct 18, 2009
    #23
  9. WiltonRoots

    WiltonRoots Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    0

    Pretty much the same here.
     
    WiltonRoots, Oct 18, 2009
    #24
  10. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    At the end of the day Nottingham went against him. Dirrell lost to hometown judging, not Froch.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #25
  11. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    54,515
    Likes Received:
    121
    115-113 Andre Dirrell

    Cleaner more effective punching ..At one point he was teaing off on Froch at will .The pt deduction was strickly a home town call as well !!
     
    Imperial1, Oct 18, 2009
    #26
  12. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, as i said it could have gone either way, to say it was a robbery is ridiculous :-(
     
    MickeyBlueEyess, Oct 18, 2009
    #27
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    27,672
    Likes Received:
    1
    So why **** on Dirrell when Froch was doing some file ****...I guess you didnt see all of the rabbit punches, and wrestling tactics??? I love how you single Dirrell out and act as if Froch was this angel!:verysad
     
    Rudyard, Oct 18, 2009
    #28
  14. ybfake

    ybfake Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    560
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the fight was a pretty clear cut win for Dirrell. Although I didnt like the way he held or kept complaining, he landed the cleaner harder shots and Frochs aggresion wasnt effective and thats the key for me. You can come foward all night but if you dont effectivly cut off the ring and land the cleaner harder shots you are just being rewarded for coming forward and taking punches. I wasnt a big Dirrell fan before the fight but I love the way he dug down in those last rounds trying to take Frochs head off. Dirrell didnt do enough for it to be a robbery but definitly a bad or hometown decision.
     
    ybfake, Oct 18, 2009
    #29
  15. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    A clear robbery. No question. How could Froch win when he wasn't hitting Dirrell? You have to hit the other guy to deserve a win.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 5