WHO WON THE FROCH-DIRRELL FIGHT? Vote & either post your scorecard or explain why...

I didnt write down my score round, However I did have Dirrell ahead I think I had it 7 rounds to 5, either way Dirrells style is not one that I like so for most of you who know me and the style I like, to say Dirrell won here means well he was robbed.

 

Sorry ocelot but If you look at what I said, I was saying that dirrell got robbed and won the fight easily

 

116-112 Dirrel

ROBBERY!!!!

 

Blah blah blah

It was a close fight that could have gone either way but for me Dirrell was too negative, when he opened up he was impressive but it was rare that he did and he did to much holding, running, complaining, falling down, so Froch gets my vote :deal

 

Dirrell won.. but in all honesty the 1st 2 rounds there was nothing in it.. So I don't know how you can score them in someones favour..

 

Right. I was a agreeing with you.

 

He hit Froch in the face a lot more than Froch hit him. That simple.

 

At the end of the day Dirrells negativity went against him, if he had opened up like he did in the last couple of rounds he could off beat Froch easily, but he didnt, hopefully he wont be so gunshy against Abraham but i actually see him being more negative in that fight due to Abrahams power.

 

Pretty much the same here.

 

At the end of the day Nottingham went against him. Dirrell lost to hometown judging, not Froch.

 

115-113 Andre Dirrell

Cleaner more effective punching ..At one point he was teaing off on Froch at will .The pt deduction was strickly a home town call as well !!

 

No, as i said it could have gone either way, to say it was a robbery is ridiculous :-(

 

So why **** on Dirrell when Froch was doing some file ****...I guess you didnt see all of the rabbit punches, and wrestling tactics??? I love how you single Dirrell out and act as if Froch was this angel!:verysad

 

I think the fight was a pretty clear cut win for Dirrell. Although I didnt like the way he held or kept complaining, he landed the cleaner harder shots and Frochs aggresion wasnt effective and thats the key for me. You can come foward all night but if you dont effectivly cut off the ring and land the cleaner harder shots you are just being rewarded for coming forward and taking punches. I wasnt a big Dirrell fan before the fight but I love the way he dug down in those last rounds trying to take Frochs head off. Dirrell didnt do enough for it to be a robbery but definitly a bad or hometown decision.

 

A clear robbery. No question. How could Froch win when he wasn't hitting Dirrell? You have to hit the other guy to deserve a win.