Fight stats for Dirrell/Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009.


Page 1 of 8
  1. soapysouter

    soapysouter Active Member Full Member

    568
    0
    Apr 20, 2009
    Im going to be surprised if Dirrell didnt land twice as many punches as froch. I know you can't judge a fight on stats, but alot of people are saying Dirrell was too negative and didnt throw enough, but without a doubt he outlanded Froch by a big big distance. Barring round 6 I struggle to think of Froch landing many clean shots.

    How long will we have to wait for the stats to be released?

    Are there even any? and will they even release them? Who are in charge of these things, If Dirrell is clearly miles ahead on the stats would it be damaging to release them now hte decision went the wrong way?

    By the way, im british and was shouting For a Froch win. Im not going to go as far as calling it a robbery, but it was a very very poor decision.
     
    soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009
    soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009
    #1
  2. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    1,139
    0
    Jun 5, 2008
    they wont be released as the stat count wasnt put on for the fight.

    This from dan rafael on espn.
     
    calumbo, Oct 18, 2009
    calumbo, Oct 18, 2009
    #2
  3. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    1
    Nov 13, 2008
    The fight wasn't close. 7-5 dirrell at the least but I had it 8-4. Froch has no honor with his rabbit punching (his only consistent punch). Dirrell beat him easily in all criteria to score a fight. The fix was on and if you listened to those bozo commentating you would think that they were watching a different fight. Dirrell won period.
     
    lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009
    lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009
    #3
  4. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    3,751
    0
    Jul 31, 2009

    I clicked on this thread cause i really want to see the fight stats myself! If you don't base a fight on stats then what exacty do you base it on?

    Dirrell out punched Froch 2-1 and out landed 2-1!
    Dirrell hurt Froch twice in the fight yet he was never hurt!
    Dirrell outboxed Froch through out the fight!

    Overall Dirrell was the better man in the ring!

    Froch fans are saying Dirrell "ran" but yet Dirrell beat Froch to the punch on damn near all of the exchanges!

    This is why boxing is fading fast!!

    Anyone who understands boxing and the BUSINESS of boxing know why Dirrell was "suppose" to lose!
     
    Mr. HU, Oct 18, 2009
    Mr. HU, Oct 18, 2009
    #4
  5. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Dirrell's only running was when he was sliding away from the winging punches ..Funny that his fans call it running but how could he have ran all night if he was tagging Froch !!!
     
    Imperial1, Oct 18, 2009
    Imperial1, Oct 18, 2009
    #5
  6. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008

    wow, this is so stupid...

    Dirrel hurt Froch? GIF? get real noob, he never had froch hurt, and Froch's glancing blows marked his face up, Froch wasn't the one bleeding and crying to the ref.

    Boxings fading fast because of whiney bitches liek Dirrel refusing to fight and pot shotting themselves to what they hope is win, knowing full well they didn't do enough.

    Dirrel needs to be expelled from this super 6 tournament.

    :patsch
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #6
  7. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    Exactly.. delusional motherfxckers..
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #7
  8. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    your a noob..?
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #8
  9. realshocks

    realshocks Member Full Member

    273
    106
    Apr 20, 2008
    Nobody but nobody wants to watch fights like that. They would have to pay me to view if I knew what kind of fight it would be. The snoozefest was entirely down to Dirrell's spoiling tactics. I always thought Americans favoured action fighters, guys with 'heart', warriors - I'm stunned to see them backing up this guy for running away.
     
    realshocks, Oct 18, 2009
    realshocks, Oct 18, 2009
    #9
  10. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Believe me, Froch's camp will be doing anything in their power to make sure those stats aren't released. They know he got outpunched by a wide margin.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #10
  11. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    3,751
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    The reason why there isn't gonna be punch stats is because everyone in boxing knows that Dirrell is far more superior in boxing skills and If the numbers come out it will be an uproar about why Froch won!!

    The BUSINESS of boxing was counting on Froch KOing a young and "green" Dirrell! Trust me the money is in Europe at SMW right now!
     
    Mr. HU, Oct 18, 2009
    Mr. HU, Oct 18, 2009
    #11
  12. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    +1
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #12
  13. soapysouter

    soapysouter Active Member Full Member

    568
    0
    Apr 20, 2009
    I'll watch re runs and release my own stats then
     
    soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009
    soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009
    #13
  14. realshocks

    realshocks Member Full Member

    273
    106
    Apr 20, 2008
    Funny - I thought boxing scores counted aggression and force of punch.
     
    realshocks, Oct 18, 2009
    realshocks, Oct 18, 2009
    #14
  15. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    1,139
    0
    Jun 5, 2008
    dirrell hardly threw any punches bar the 10th and 11th rounds!

    He was dancing about without throwing anything for most of the middle rounds..THAT IS WHY HE LOST!!
    Had he attacked like he did in the latter rounds he would have won EASILY
     
    calumbo, Oct 18, 2009
    calumbo, Oct 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 8