WHO WON THE FROCH-DIRRELL FIGHT? Vote & either post your scorecard or explain why...

114-113 Dirrell

 

This is about the 4th or 5th poll of the same damn question, and the results always favor Dirrell in an eventual landslide. What's the purpose here, make enough polls so people get tired of clicking Dirrell all the time, and Froch artificially comes out ahead?

 

I still see that some of you got the nerve to post your score card with froch winning the 10th round. I can't take anything else about your post seriously when I see that because dirrell almost knocked him out in that round.

 

See the issue is most of you neither posses the knowledge or are qualified to score a fight.

And when someone who is posts the reasons why you are wrong, its totally ignored.

Its simply a USA V UK fight and that is why this forum does not and will never carry the respect within the boxing community that it could.

 

I had it 115-112 Andre Dirrell.

Dirrell won because Froch's face took a pounding whereas Dirrell's did not. Ineffective aggression from Froch for the most part.

These poll results, like the last ones, indicate clearly that the decision was suspect.

 

i thought Dirrell clearly won this fight....it was very ugly, plenty of mistakes made by both but

Dirrell succeeded (or atleast in comaparison) of hitting without being hit ANNNND he was landing the more eyecatching shots

i wont say he was robbed, cuzz the fight was so ugly that i can see how it ended up the way it did, but i willl say Dirrell should be the champ IMO at the very least

 

EX****INGCTLY!! Why can't the morons and ******s see this?:huh

I KNEW this would happen if Dirrell lost on points. It's the same old crap unless a fighter is Laceyed.

 

Don't embarass yourself. It was close enough for 11 posters so far to think it was a draw for ****s sakeatsch

 

Dirrell schooled him. All these Brits on here crying tryin to make it seem a legit decision, its sad. Britain is the new Germany.

All the polls say the same damn thing Dirrell was robbed

 

Dirrell won.

He was acting like a ***** in the process complaining all the time but he still won. He landed the meaningful punches and outlanded Froch.

I think Dirrell has to man up and stop acting like sissy but he won the fight clearly. I'm amazed Froch was so arrogant afterwards.

 

Not worth reading. Your scoring blows. Round 1 Even, Round 2 Froch, Round 10 Froch?!?

You sound like you're from London!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znW6bHxzExc[/ame]

 

I also saw it lopsided for Dirrell.

 

Dirrell's first time on the biggest of stages. If he can learn from this and come to understand that a title fight is a place where you need to be prepared to get dirty, he will become a better man for it. If you get hit on the back of the head, sometimes you gotta retaliate in kind. That's the fight game.

 

Froch wins.

Dirrell needed to show he wanted the belt more than he did.

 

Like, for instance, outlanding Froch and taking very few clean shots on his own end?