Serious question for Froch fans

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    When Dirrell stood and traded with Froch and had him doing the chicken dance, what was going through your mind?
     
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    #1
  2. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Serious question, How can you come here and lie with a straight face and say Froch won, then claim your a fan of the sport?
     
    Bazooka, Oct 18, 2009
    Bazooka, Oct 18, 2009
    #2
  3. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    :thumbsup:thumbsup I cant believe that anyone on here can even say that Froch won:patsch:rofl:patsch Froch sucks balls,and will get his ass whupped by everyone else in the tourney!
     
    anarci, Oct 18, 2009
    anarci, Oct 18, 2009
    #3
  4. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    This content is protected
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #4
  5. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    But yeah serious answer I was think don't get too wreckless froch. But to honest I don't like the guy cause I think he's the next Roy jones or anything. I like him cause he at least gives'er and doesn't make a fuss about who they stick infront of him. I do feel a little sorry for Dirrell cause I had him winning but he was very negative and stunk the joint out. If he had more faith or a different attitude he would have prevailed.
     
    o_money, Oct 18, 2009
    o_money, Oct 18, 2009
    #5
  6. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Sorry, were you drunk when you were watching this fight? Go rewatch the 10th, and when Froch legs nearly give out, come back to me and talk about molesting? It wasnt molesting. Dirrell raped him that night. It was clear Dirrell won. Apologists like you who say he "stunk the joint out" for boxing an intelligent counter punching fight, then sitting down on his punches later and nearly getting froch out, are the reason these decisions happen in boxing.
     
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    #6
  7. alltimegreat

    alltimegreat New Member Full Member

    50
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    The SD for Froch wasn't a bad decision. It was a hard fight to score and was very even. I think Froch's lack of skills did get exposed but Dirrell proved to be a coward despite his superior skills. Froch was pressing the action and Dirrell ran. There was no robbery. Just a boring, dirty fight where both fighters could have looked a lot better. Dan Rafael also had Froch winning 114-113.
     
    alltimegreat, Oct 18, 2009
    alltimegreat, Oct 18, 2009
    #7
  8. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    WTF? I don't give a **** what fat ass Dan Rafael thought of the fight. He's a big pile of cellulite in a swivel chair with a laptop, not a boxer or an authority.
     
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    ocelot, Oct 18, 2009
    #8
  9. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Boxing intelligent from the outside equals coward in your book? So Pernell Whitaker, Floyd Mayweather, Willie Pep, all cowards in your book.


    Even when Froch pressed the action Dirrell beat him to the punch. You're a clown.


    Froch barely landed any punches. Dirrell was beating him from post to post from 10-12 and nearly had him out in the 10th. How wasnt it a robbery clown?


    Rafael is a joke then aswell. Btw, the British announcers and American announcers, and 70% of this forum had it for Dirrell. That trumps both your dumbasses.
     
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    Danny_Rand, Oct 18, 2009
    #9
  10. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    I KNEW when the Split Decision was announced that people were going to use it as a crutch. A way to justify a bad decision. This thing was UNANIMOUS for Dirrell.
     
    Marnoff, Oct 18, 2009
    Marnoff, Oct 18, 2009
    #10
  11. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008
    Keep preaching brotha.
     
    MemoCan, Oct 18, 2009
    MemoCan, Oct 18, 2009
    #11
  12. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    It is a shame Dirrell did not fight rounds 1 to 9 the same way he fought 10 to 12 because he was doing very well on the inside and going toe to toe.
     
    Taylex, Oct 18, 2009
    Taylex, Oct 18, 2009
    #12
  13. alltimegreat

    alltimegreat New Member Full Member

    50
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    Comparing Dirrell to Mayweather is bull****. Mayweather actually lands hard clean shots to decisively win rounds. Dirrell did not do that. And I'm not a Froch fan/nuthugger.
     
    alltimegreat, Oct 18, 2009
    alltimegreat, Oct 18, 2009
    #13
  14. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    I don't believe either fighter deserved to win. I don't believe either fighter was clearly dominant for seven rounds. As such, the fight would have been scored a draw, with the exception of the point deduction in the 9th.

    I mean, cmon bro - if your son went out and boxed like Dirrell, would you really praise him? I wouldn't.
     
    PugilisticPower, Oct 18, 2009
    PugilisticPower, Oct 18, 2009
    #14
  15. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    you're joking right? :patsch:patsch:patsch
     
    doubleplaidinum, Oct 18, 2009
    doubleplaidinum, Oct 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3