Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

Sorry I can only laugh when an obvious **** sucking ****** calls me a *****.

 

Going to ground (for any reason other than a slip or the a result of a punch) is not legal. Excessive holding is not legal. Ducking below the belt line of the opponent is not legal (for any length of time - Mayweather fans take note).

 

Lets be fair, that was also the best 56 seconds of the fight:yep

 

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

 

Here's what I want to know. If Froch "almost got KO'd" here the way Danny keeps saying, why was Dirrell the one going backward as the bell rang?

 

Dirrell won the fight, plain and simple

 

huh?? I thought Dirrel won...but what was that exactly?? 1 min of round 10??

 

okay, for those who didn't watch the fight, if you see someone's scorecard and the last 3 rounds are for Froch, that card has ABSOLUTELY NOOOOO clout

 

brilliant

 

I also like how Dirrell just ran all the way to the end ..

 

Well, as long as they are confident, they may as well not hold the fight. Game over.

I think there's a pretty good chance Froch doesn't beat Kessler or AA and doesn't advance. But your dismissal of Kessler is as big a joke as any Froch backer - I seem to recall Kessler held up pretty well in the Calzaghe fight. You have absolutely NO evidence Ward is "several levels" above the field. Oh, right... his trainer said so...

 

who landed more, who landed more efficiently????deal DIRRELL thats who

 

wow. one of the most unbiased videos i've ever seen


from over half an hour of running, holding and whining, you pick out 56 seconds of Dirrell offence


atsch

 

No, 56 seconds.

 

Its a reminder to people who think he spent 12 rounds running..

As mentioned.. find me 56 seconds of the fight were Froch does more.. it's a fair ask..