Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

The poll in the Brit forum is 124-81 in favour of Dirrell.

 

Once again the lack of ZERO, and I mean ZERO inside game from dirrell lost him rounds.....Sure, I will admit dirrell out landed him, I thought dirrell boxed beautifully when he kept in the center of the ring, but when he sat in the corner or on the ropes froch did his work....once again I hope your not one of those that said froch didnt land anything? who's face looked like **** afterwards? it wasnt froch.....the rounds dirrell rocked froch I gave them to him, but round 10 makes it even...

and YES i agree for the first minute 30 of round 12 dirrell was winning the round, but then after that it became an ugly trading shots inside fight, that made it a froch round....dirrell himself said he could have done more in the 12th....

 

Thanks for posting the fight, that should settle this debate once and for all...but something tells me it wont

 

Ahh, apparently your ***gotry is getting to me. I better stay away from you, or I'll be dressing in high heels and sucking **** soon enough. :rofl

 

Oh come on, anytime dirrell was on the inside with froch, what did he do? somebody tell me this?....froch did his work for 2:30 seconds of round 12, and once again dirrell said he didnt do enough in round 12, fact jack

 

What did Froch do exactly in the 12th round in that 30 seconds (it was really 20 seconds) that won him the fight?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl i bet you where being generous to froch as well

 

Round 2 was pretty definite for Dirrell IMO.

 

Froch SUCKS. He fights like a ****ing ******

 

Kessler....you are DISMISSED. Evidence: you are slow, robotic and overrated. Ward is quick, fluid and will outclass the **** out of you.

 

:huh

People really had been saying that. Go back a few pages and you'll see. Virtually everyone was saying he was too green, had never been 12, his chin was garbage etc.

 

Agree. Froch won the 3rd, but in the second I don't think he even landed three clean shots.

My Card

1 even
2 Dirrell
3 Froch
4 Dirrell
5 Dirrell
6 Dirrell
7 Froch
8 Froch
9 Dirrell
10 Even (9-9
11 Dirrell
12 Dirrell


116-112. eash win even without the 3 points you could have deducted from Froch.

Keith
7

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

I hope you meant that to be as amusing as it was....

 

How? what did dirrell do when he was on the inside or in a sloppy inside fight?...Nothing, Zero, Nada....

 

I even question that card, round 1 was clear for dirrell....this goes to show you it was a close fight....