Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

:rofl better yet, find me a video where froch landed ONE punch of consequence. that was one of the most one-sided fights i've ever seen. how the **** can you even argue with that?

 

They pick a bad time to pull some **** like this. This super 6 was suppose to be about who is the best super middle but the winnder of last night's fight goes home a loser wtf. Is disgusting. AA vs Taylor went well and they have to **** with a high profile fight like this. is a shame.

 

They pick a bad time to pull some **** like this. This super 6 was suppose to be about who is the best super middle weight but the winner of last night's fight goes home a loser wtf. Is disgusting. AA vs Taylor went well and they have to **** with a high profile fight like this. is a shame. I must admit that this tournment lost a lot of appeal tp me. The crowd were trained like dogs. Everytime Froch throws anything they stand up like he was going for the kill but I can't remember but 2 clean shots from the guy and the rest is hold and hit or rabbit punches.

 

A bad decision, but this tournament isn't about just one fight. Dirrell can still go on.

 

can people shut the **** up about it being tainted... holy **** lol

 

Unfortunately 56 seconds doesn't take the champs belt.

 

Not if he ends up eliminated by 1 point.

 

The fight was close.

Grow up and stop being a drama queen ffs.

 

They stole dirrell's o. This wasn't the case of paulie vs diaz. At least Diaz landed the harder blows. Dirrell landed more, control the fight more, showed better defense, had froch hurt, and got penalize for no damn reason. Bull crap.

 

Haven't even seen the fight yet but people are clearly giving me the impression Direll was robbed, however if those 56seconds where the best bit of this fight I'm not sure I can endure it all.

I'll try...

 

Dirrells face was clean too because he didn't get hit 20 times in it the whole fight and only took 1 hard shot from froch in the 8th that did nothing. Blatant robbery and anyone that thinks dirrell wasn't hitting froch ALOT MORE THAN FROCH WAS HITTING DIRRELL NEED TO WATCH THE REPLAY IN SLOW MO TO SEE HOW MUCH FROCH'S HEAD GOT SNAPPED BACK

 

That 56 seconds was a clip taken from the fight to prove that Dirrell hurt Froch in the 10th as a lot of his fans were denying it. No one is trying to say that is the only success Dirrell had in the entire fight, it is just one example of the success he had landing on Froch.

 

If you cant bear it all, just go watch the last 3 rounds. Dirrell won even with his crappy avoidant tactics. Its safe to say all of us fans were losers both because of the poor quality of the fight and the final homecooking result.

 

Unfortunately 12 rounds of hitting Air and brain stems dosen't allow you to keep your belt.

 

Making multiple threads on the same subject doesn't dry Dirrells eyes.

He super 6 is tainted, because one of the 6 boxers, doesn't want to fight, he may be paid up by UFC to make boxing look ****, who knows?

This was meant to be a competition of warriors, instead we got this chump in it.

This content is protected