Froch landed punches too. And he was also at times the one who at least tried, while Dirrell did nothing but escape on the ropes not even punching back when he had Froch off balance. However, in some rounds, Dirrell still outlanded Froch. I would need to sit through the whole mess taking notes to say if Dirrell outlanded Froch in enough rounds, or fell short not doing enough in too many. Dirrell may very well have won the fight on a fair score.
The ref was a joke one of the worst i;ve seen. If you take away a point from one you should have taken away a point for the other.
Dirrell won that ****in fight ... I wish there was a case for a rematch because that fight was some ****in stupid ass **** ... the ref was lame and Froch was lame. Lets go Michigan ... Grand Rapids in the house !!
Froch is a ****in disgrace to boxing ... anyone who thinks that Froch did enough to win needs to watch UFC because I don't think you guys have a place in "boxing" ... Froch didn't even hit anything ... what a shitty job by Showtime ... another reason why they are second rate to HBO.
A disgrace to boxing huh. This so called runner who over 70% of the pop. here on esb believe won, who outlanded the "champ" and had him on shaky legs is a disgrace to boxing:huh. You are a disgrace to life for saying somethin so stupid.
:good YES... He's more suited to track and field anyway. If there was an event that combined running and crying he'd be gold! :|