Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, Aug 24, 2009.


  1. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    not always.. your acting as if theres never been a bad decision before..
     
  2. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Maybe alot of people didnt see the punches land because the punches DIDNT LAND.
     
  3. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,270
    95
    Apr 30, 2008
    :happy
     
  4. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    Ok, dummy from scotland!!!
     
  5. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    to finish the thread thought...the general consensus of the fight is that it stunk. End of story.
     
  6. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Froch landed punches too. And he was also at times the one who at least tried, while Dirrell did nothing but escape on the ropes not even punching back when he had Froch off balance. However, in some rounds, Dirrell still outlanded Froch. I would need to sit through the whole mess taking notes to say if Dirrell outlanded Froch in enough rounds, or fell short not doing enough in too many. Dirrell may very well have won the fight on a fair score.
     
  7. (PimpThaSystem)

    (PimpThaSystem) Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,774
    4
    Jun 7, 2009
    Yeah are you people scoring the hip toss? Cause that was cool.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,867
    34,854
    Jun 23, 2005
    The ref was a joke one of the worst i;ve seen. If you take away a point from one you should have taken away a point for the other.
     
  9. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    Great post !! :good

    Froch had 3 take downs ... only thing that was wrong is that Froch had shoes on.
     
  10. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  11. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    Dirrell won that ****in fight ... I wish there was a case for a rematch because that fight was some ****in stupid ass **** ... the ref was lame and Froch was lame.

    Lets go Michigan ... Grand Rapids in the house !!
     
  12. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    Froch is a ****in disgrace to boxing ... anyone who thinks that Froch did enough to win needs to watch UFC because I don't think you guys have a place in "boxing" ... Froch didn't even hit anything ... what a shitty job by Showtime ... another reason why they are second rate to HBO.
     
  13. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    hang yourself..
     
  14. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    A disgrace to boxing huh. This so called runner who over 70% of the pop. here on esb believe won, who outlanded the "champ" and had him on shaky legs is a disgrace to boxing:huh. You are a disgrace to life for saying somethin so stupid.
     
  15. Predicto

    Predicto Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,435
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    :good YES... He's more suited to track and field anyway.

    If there was an event that combined running and crying he'd be gold! :|