FROCH VS DIRRELL : official judges' scorecards released

Daniel Van de Wiele (Belgium)
1: Dirrell 10-9
2: Froch 10-9
3: Dirrell 10-9
4: Froch 10-9
5: Froch 10-9
6: Froch 10-9
7: Froch 10-9
8: Froch 10-9
9: Froch 10-9
10: Dirrell 9-9
11: Dirrell 10-9
12: Dirrell 10-9
Froch 115-112

Massimo Barrovecchio (Italy)
1: Froch 10-9
2: Dirrell 10-9
3: Froch 10-9
4: Dirrell 10-9
5: Dirrell 10-9
6: Froch 10-9
7: Froch 10-9
8: Froch 10-9
9: Dirrell 10-9
10: Dirrell 9-9
11: Froch 10-9
12: Froch 10-9
Froch 115-112

Alejandro Rochin (Mexico)
1: Froch 10-9
2: Dirrell 10-9
3: Froch 10-9
4: Dirrell 10-9
5: Dirrell 10-9
6: Froch 10-9
7: Froch 10-9
8: Froch 10-9
9: Dirrell 9-9
10: Dirrell 10-9
11: Dirrell 10-9
12: Dirrell 10-9
Dirrell 113-114

 

Wasn't that like the most clear round for Dirrell? :huh

 

By far. Makes you wonder what fight he was watching.

 

It was. The only one you HAVE TO score for Dirrell.

Many many rubbish rounds that were hard to score, but round 11 was a brilliant round for Dirrell imo.

 

Man is obvious that they are paid off. Dirrell won early and late rounds easy. Froch start rough house in the middle so u can make an arguement that he took the middle rounds.

 

Thats the round Froch did the stanky leg

 

round 10 was teh clearest Dirrell round.

 

If they had used that combined scoring that they tried several years ago Dirrell would have won 7-5 or 114-113 with the lost of the point.

PS its seems pretty clear that some wrong doing was going on with those cards, how in the **** could the Italian judge give Froch the last two rounds. WOW That just made it even worst in my mind. That is huge those were rounds were Dirrell clearly won the rounds.atsch

 

even the paid off belguim guy know better to score dirrell 11 and 12 but the italy guy is just clueless. The Italy guy accidently gave dirrell too many early rounds and had to give froch the last two like a dumb idiot.

 

He didn't win the early rounds 'easy' - you could make a case for him winning them, but the first 4 were split in my opinion (I still had Dirrell winning the fight).

 

Goes to show you how hard of a fight this was to judge. The judges only agreed on:
6: Froch
7: Froch
8: Froch
10: Dirrell

by the way, how come their 9-9 rounds don't match where Dirrell was docked a point?

 

Yeah I would love to see him sit and watch the last two rounds in public and explain why he gave the rounds to Froch?? If that corupt judge had scored the last two rounds the way he should have Dirrell wins the fight the way he should have... 114-113 twice

 

I disagree. Froch was doing quite well for most of the round. Dirrell catches Froch towards the end, but I can see a case for giving it to Froch still. People could easily argue that Dirrell shouldn't get the round just for looking better for 30 seconds of it.

At least I don't think it is anywhere as clear as round 11. In round 11 he dominated the action through-out pretty much, not just the last 30 seconds.

 

I thought the 10th was the clearest round...the 10th is when Froch did a little dance before the bell...

But 11 was clearly a Dirrell round...

 

The 10th was pretty close up until the little dance Froch did but the 11th was the round where Dirrell really sat down on a lot of his punches and let his hands go and landed maybe 10 hard, flush shots.