FROCH VS DIRRELL : official judges' scorecards released

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Oct 20, 2009.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Daniel Van de Wiele (Belgium)
    1: Dirrell 10-9
    2: Froch 10-9
    3: Dirrell 10-9
    4: Froch 10-9
    5: Froch 10-9
    6: Froch 10-9
    7: Froch 10-9
    8: Froch 10-9
    9: Froch 10-9
    10: Dirrell 9-9
    11: Dirrell 10-9
    12: Dirrell 10-9
    Froch 115-112

    Massimo Barrovecchio (Italy)
    1: Froch 10-9
    2: Dirrell 10-9
    3: Froch 10-9
    4: Dirrell 10-9
    5: Dirrell 10-9
    6: Froch 10-9
    7: Froch 10-9
    8: Froch 10-9
    9: Dirrell 10-9
    10: Dirrell 9-9
    11: Froch 10-9
    12: Froch 10-9
    Froch 115-112

    Alejandro Rochin (Mexico)
    1: Froch 10-9
    2: Dirrell 10-9
    3: Froch 10-9
    4: Dirrell 10-9
    5: Dirrell 10-9
    6: Froch 10-9
    7: Froch 10-9
    8: Froch 10-9
    9: Dirrell 9-9
    10: Dirrell 10-9
    11: Dirrell 10-9
    12: Dirrell 10-9
    Dirrell 113-114
     
  2. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Wasn't that like the most clear round for Dirrell? :huh
     
  3. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    By far. Makes you wonder what fight he was watching.
     
  4. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    It was. The only one you HAVE TO score for Dirrell.

    Many many rubbish rounds that were hard to score, but round 11 was a brilliant round for Dirrell imo.
     
  5. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Man is obvious that they are paid off. Dirrell won early and late rounds easy. Froch start rough house in the middle so u can make an arguement that he took the middle rounds.
     
  6. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Thats the round Froch did the stanky leg
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    round 10 was teh clearest Dirrell round.
     
  8. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    If they had used that combined scoring that they tried several years ago Dirrell would have won 7-5 or 114-113 with the lost of the point.

    PS its seems pretty clear that some wrong doing was going on with those cards, how in the **** could the Italian judge give Froch the last two rounds. WOW That just made it even worst in my mind. That is huge those were rounds were Dirrell clearly won the rounds.:patsch
     
  9. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    even the paid off belguim guy know better to score dirrell 11 and 12 but the italy guy is just clueless. The Italy guy accidently gave dirrell too many early rounds and had to give froch the last two like a dumb idiot.
     
  10. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    He didn't win the early rounds 'easy' - you could make a case for him winning them, but the first 4 were split in my opinion (I still had Dirrell winning the fight).
     
  11. gorgse

    gorgse Active Member Full Member

    1,393
    0
    Oct 20, 2008
    Goes to show you how hard of a fight this was to judge. The judges only agreed on:
    6: Froch
    7: Froch
    8: Froch
    10: Dirrell

    by the way, how come their 9-9 rounds don't match where Dirrell was docked a point?
     
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Yeah I would love to see him sit and watch the last two rounds in public and explain why he gave the rounds to Froch?? If that corupt judge had scored the last two rounds the way he should have Dirrell wins the fight the way he should have... 114-113 twice
     
  13. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    I disagree. Froch was doing quite well for most of the round. Dirrell catches Froch towards the end, but I can see a case for giving it to Froch still. People could easily argue that Dirrell shouldn't get the round just for looking better for 30 seconds of it.

    At least I don't think it is anywhere as clear as round 11. In round 11 he dominated the action through-out pretty much, not just the last 30 seconds.
     
  14. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004
    I thought the 10th was the clearest round...the 10th is when Froch did a little dance before the bell...

    But 11 was clearly a Dirrell round...
     
  15. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    The 10th was pretty close up until the little dance Froch did but the 11th was the round where Dirrell really sat down on a lot of his punches and let his hands go and landed maybe 10 hard, flush shots.