Martinez-Cintron was much worse. That Corley fight against the 6'1" prospect was pretty bad also. I thought Diaz-Malignaggi was worse. Sturm-Gevor was much worse. Dirrell-Froch was scored poorly, IMO, but there is a legitimate argument that Froch won, if you give him a few of the close early rounds based on aggressiveness.
Its not even close. The Cintron-Martinez farce was far worse - not 1 but 2 blatantly incorrect/crooked decisions in the same fight...
If Sturm vs Gevor was much worse it must've been like 118-110 in favor of Gevor. That's too much! Dirrel was leading something like 115-112. 116-111, wasnt scoring it, cuz I thought Dirrel wins after 30 seconds in round 1 and he was leading big time.
Not even close to the worst!!! Fury Vs Mcdermott was ten times poorer. Froch against Dirrell looked a lot closer from ringside than on the telly. At the time i scored it 115 - 112 liek 2two of the judges but when i got home a scored Froch up by one.
I didnt think Diaz-Mallignaggi was a bad decision personally, this is the worst Ive seen this year, but havent seen the Martinez fight
hmmmmm i dont think it was a poor decision, the closeness of each card shows how difficult the fight was to score. Martinez got horribly robbed against Cintron. I don't even know how he managed to con the ref into saying it was a headbutt!!! For me, an i'll get flack for this, the worst decision was cotto v clottey. I know it was close, but I think clottey deserved it. With that one wrong scorecard he went from being a truly great WW to being a gatekeeper.