What you can't take away from calzaghe

Just as a matter of interest, do you actually even know or understand any of the bolded part?

 

no.

 

I thought as much.

 

as much as what?

 

Joe had a tough ass chin.

Sure he was down by Mitchell, Hopkins and Jones, but not one of them had him the least wobbly and in dire straits. Mitchell's was a humdinger as well. I was shocked that Joe got up so quickly.

And that upper cut by Kessler would have laid out many a man, and Joe just kept on going. Jones did one on him as well, and with the same effects. Tough *******, and we can contend this or that about his record, but if we're at all honest with ourselves, you can only admire the man's career - amateur and pro, and with damaged hands - which I think should be a plus considering, rather than a negative because even limited in arsenal, nobody knocked him the **** out or defeated him.

 

If you're being serious; you are a rather stupid individual.

If you're joking; the same applies.

 

insults already,but we've only just met!

Go fart peas at the moon !!

 

Good point, how are you doing Socrates?

 

FINE MATE, YOURSELF?

 

I'm watching Heat while I answer some questions about my lesson planning for tomorrow. I am bored but not too bored.

 

GOOD GOOD...

shall i start with a 'my dads bigger than yours' type retort or cut straight to a 'yo mama so fat' classic?

 

He's one of them that will be appreciated in 5 years, when Kessler wins the super 6 and Hopkins and Jones puts some more whoopings on people his stock will rise.

I happen to think his record is pretty good. certainly above average.

 

He should have fought Johnson, true. But I think Joe knew that Glen was a tough ******* who would give him hell, and he was worried about his hands as usual.

 

Mebbe we should leave our conversation at that for the time being, and talk boxing next time we meet.

 

we shall do that.