Why does Dirrell fall down on canvas?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Oct 21, 2009.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Froch should have been disqualified. I counted 7 warnings for rabbit punching, and a bunch of other fouls the ref ignored. If I had my way Team Dirrell would protest that fight, and just say **** the tournament, and demand that the WBC order an immediate rematch. The blatant body slam alone was just cause for disqualification.
     
  2. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,444
    1,704
    Nov 20, 2007
    He was pretty neverous in the 1st half (looked scared if you ask me) and has balance issues anyway.

    BTW, the rulebook says any fighter who throws himself to the canvas should get an 8 count. Obviously slipping, being pushed down and **** like that is a different thing, but if you fall into your punches or fall down as you move away quicky without balance, you should get a count no matter how ridiculous may it sound. But it's a fair rule. Fight, or if you move away, don't go down.

    The best thing would've been an early count for Dirrell, because he would've become pissed like after the point decuction when he started to fight. Don't get me wrong, he won on my card anyway, be he should've started to be more agressive sooner to convince the judges. Therefore an early count or point deduction would've benefited him IMO.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,117
    2,751
    Jul 20, 2004
    Because now British fighters are allowed to bodyslam in England going in against foreign fighters. All credit to Ricky Hatton and co.
     
  4. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    That explains two of them, what about the other 13?
     
  5. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Yea i know huh, weak enough to rock Froch, the "Ironman" :lol:. Glad Froch will never have to read that comment, he'd have to come to terms that he was rocked by a weak man.
     
  6. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    sheer, unadulterated terror
     
  7. K2ray

    K2ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,040
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  8. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    0
    Feb 6, 2007

    I'm not sure why he did that FOUR times:huh

    I also can't work out why such a talented boxer should resort to running and holding thus losing the decision:huh
     
  9. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    0
    Feb 6, 2007
    As usual you're talking bollocks. Froch wasn't warned for rabbit punches anywhere near seven times, and on the occasions he was warned it was in response to Ruiz-Bolt ducking too low which is also against the rules
     
  10. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    He slipped a bunch of times. His feet are fast but his footwork is so-so, and the mat was probably slippery. Froch's feet are slow and he plants them, so he didn't have the problem. This isn't a "strategy". He's never done this in any other fight.
     
  11. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Hey, it's not just in England. Cotto did it to Clottey. And Solis did it to Cruz (and got deducted a point for it).
     
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,862
    34,843
    Jun 23, 2005
    :lol::rofl:lol:
     
  13. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    3,751
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    Preach on!!!:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:happy:happy:happy