Carl Froch-Andre Dirrell Punch stats 100% ROBBERY

How could Dirrell land 280 punches when he didn't even throw that many?

 

ofcourse you are happy to accept the judges because they scored it for who you wanted to win. doesnt mean he deserved it. thats exactly what im talkin about. you just a happy with the fact that the judges gave froch the nod but at the end of the day, neither you nor the rest of the froch fans can give a valid reason on why froch deserved the W. And just because the judges were "Professional" doesnt mean that their decision was right.

 

6% for froch seems a bit high to me

 

you are tad bias yourself though... just a teeny weeny tiny tad... no???

 

i hardly comment on here but get over it - it was a close close fight - not a robbery - majority of boxing writers plus the judges gave it to froch - if dirrell is that good he will still get to the semis.

 

The Froch huggers must hate this thread. Basically, because it's indisputable, regardless of whether these are 'official' stats or not.

 

ive love these threads...:happy
the records will ALLWAYS show froch w12 v dirrell...:yepand theres nothing you can do or say that will change that...:smoke

 

Source or STFU :deal You, me and everyone else knows these numbers are complete fantasy

 

:deal

 

Shithouse punch count i would say the real stats would look closer to 2:1. Dirrell definitely won it but those stats aren't right at all. Froch got a fair few touches with the jab throughout the night. Powerpunch stats however would look very lopsided.

 

The numbers are completely made up. How is that indisputable?

 

and your record on ESB will always show that you're a loser. And there's nothing you can do to change it. :happy:happy

 

Simple question: arithmetic, can you do it? Watch the fight again. Add up the punches that Froch connected with; add up the punches that Dirrell connected with. Dirrell connected with many more punches. Therefore, indisputable.

 

:huh

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=boxer&human_id=97570