Carl Froch-Andre Dirrell Punch stats 100% ROBBERY

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrPR, Oct 24, 2009.


  1. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Then why didn't Hopkins walk through Calzaghe's punches and knock him out? Why, because they hurt.
     
  2. h2hkiller

    h2hkiller Guest

    I was wondering if there was a punchstat for that fight! Anyone who saw that fight would see it the same way, Dirrell outpunched Froch.
     
  3. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    But why did you have Froch winning?
     
  4. KingCobra

    KingCobra IBF World Champion Full Member

    5,933
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    Even though these stats are shite, it wouldn't matter anyway. As you all know, fights are scored on the 10 point must system which is round based not punch based. A fighter could land a load of punches in a couple of rounds which increases his average over a fight. It doesn't necessarily mean the fighter won more rounds. If punch stats were the be-all and end-all they would be used to determine the winner of a fight.....but they aren't and they're not.
     
  5. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Because he is a counter puncher. Thats not his style to walk through punches.
     
  6. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Abraham v Taylor was a close fight. Froch v Dirrell was not.
    Still waiting for a valid explanation of how Froch won from the Brits, other than the lame excuse that the inept judges said he won. Waiting.....hello....still waiting...
     
  7. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Just state why you think Froch won and quit beating around the bush
     
  8. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Not at all, no one including americans really thought taylor was winning that fight before the ko. nice try tho
     
  9. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Translate: because the punches hurt and he didn't want to risk getting hit with any more of them than he had to. Your definition of Hopkins is not a counter-puncher but a loser. I'm a big Hopkins fan, but Calzaghe unnerved him, plain and simple.
     
  10. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    They cant do it, which is very sad tbh. They cant give one good explanation on why froch won.
     
  11. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    It's been a week now and I haven't heard one legitimate explanation of how Froch won, only "Froch won, get over it Yank". :lol:
     
  12. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    finally the numbers come out! they look pretty much exactly like i thought they would. what a ****in joke.
     
  13. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    I know right. Thats the biggeset cop out ever. Thats what you say when you know you lost and got a gift. They should just take the W and STFU before they really look like idiots when Froch gets sparked. Like they havent learned from the Hatton fiasco. Dont hype up limited fighters, its just gonna make you look stupid in the end.
     
  14. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    yeah. it's all one big conspiracy to make froch look bad... :-(

    look, obviously fights are not scored solely on punch stats. that said, stats like these portray an obvious winner. you simply CANNOT win a championship fight landing 6% of your punches. no other factors in the world can make up for that.
     
  15. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    :deal:deal

    Froch is getting iced badly by Kessler and Abraham. Abraham will knock him out cold.