So many dumb posters here. They just used the overall ability to measure the pound for pound (idiots). No matter how, you freaking nuthuggers.
But the problem is there's better fighters in his weight division.Margarito,Clottey,Cotto. He hasn't challenged not one. I think the reason why he won't.Is he will look like a scared lil **** when facing a strong Ww, he will be running fa sure. They are about on par in terms of physical attributes like weight, height, strength and definitely stronger than him. If you think about, why he fights these guys? Judah, Gatti, Baldi and Hoya. There not the elites in the division. and to make it worse, except the gatti win, the rest were snoozefest lol.
a) This content is protected ......he has been fighting at a size disadvantage since he moved up in 2002 This content is protected b)how Mayweather will never do that he is a 5 weight champion This content is protected c) the fight was a wleterweight never the less 1 pound 2 pounds same weight the fight would have ended the same...you even know this.:hi: d) has he had that disadvantage himself....ever heard of Castillo, Hernandez, DLH ETC. Mayweather has been the smaller fighter in most his fights no excuse. e) atsch...I guess you were wishing so much for him to lose you didnt expect him to dominate Marquez who in his own right is great. It is what it is. He won nothing more nothing less.
Pac's been ko'd twice, and he lost a decision to Morales...and that is why he can never be called pfp best until he defeats Floyd.
Excuses, excuses lol... Floyd beat Castillo twice, and PAc was knocked out twice, and lost to Morales, and therefore can't be pfp best and you know it.
Pac lost by ko twice early in his career, and he lost to Morales this decade which you Pac fans seem to forget.
I dont put too much emphasis on his first two loses but it can be said he lost in his prime to a shop worn Morales and it was a clear win for Morales....Also his struggles with Marquez...he never seperated himself from himIMO and Marquez won the 2nd and Pac-Man won the first. Also, during Mayweather's hiatus he defeated fighters Mayweather's already defeated and Mayweather defeated a better DLH who wasnt a mummy so how can he pass PBF p4p?
I don't count the two early ko losses Pac suffered also...but they happened, and PAc's fans hate when I post the videos. You are right Pug, PAc's fans always forget that PAc lost to Morales this decade. I guess that was a long time ago also.
not really, you're the only poster here that put too much emphasis on those two loses (dont try to pretend you aren't). whenever i see you post, that is usually what you use to retaliate with those what you called "*******s" when you get into an arguement. about the morales loss, i have always accepted that he lost to the better man that night. but IMO that version of pac is not yet the "prime" pac that we are seeing today. what would happen/who would win if prime pac vs prime morales fight is beyond me.
main reason why pac is still the p4p#1 is because of that "hiatus". IMO if he didn't retire, pac will not get that top spot unless: 1. someone beats floyd 2. pac himself beats him 3. large disparity of accomplishments ( pac beats guys like shane, cotto, etc. while floyd beats lesser fighters ) but now that he came from more than one year of inactivity, he is now on the other side of the table. hell get the top spot if: 1. pac gets beaten 2. floyd himself beats pac 3. floyd has to beat someone significant for his career (as good as jmm is, a bloated version of him is just not significant enough for pbf to propell his stature back to being the king again). IMO beat shane first
dude, your post is not even related to what i've posted. you just went straight to "floyd is the best"...