Who's a better all round fighter, Pacquao or Calzaghe?

Which one of these fighters can do more things in their aresonal?

 

It's far less funny than you thinking Pacquiao beats a prime Ike Quartey.

 

Pacquiao.

 

Most people think Calzaghe is a good all around fighter that could fight many styles so I just wanna know what people think. I don't know why your laughin unless you don't take Calzaghe seriously at all.

 

No, it really isn't.

 

I love Pacman and have no love or hate for Calzaghe but it's Calzaghe.

 

All around? Calzaghe, no question.

 

I'd have to agree as well. Infact Pacquao has never fought a great tactician like Hopkins who can also adapt very well in fights.

 

Calzaghe is a very good all around fighter and I respect his skills but I don't think its fair to him to compare him to Pcaquiao in terms of p4p. Pacquiao is a much better all-around fighter.

 

uHHHHH MARQUEZ?

 

He didn't really say that did he?

 

Are you serious?:blood He actually said that?

 

Oh yes it is. You were the only person who picked Pac in that thread, what does that tell you? You need to take those Pac-tinted glasses off sometimes. Actually, I'd love to see you list some names from 130-147 - no explanation, just names & they can be current or retired - of who you actually feel Pacman loses to.

Explain 'in terms of P4P' please. You don't seem to know what you're talking about, you just seem to be trying to make excuses for why Pac is apparently a far better all-round - the key word - fight than Calzaghe.

 

JMM. And he gave Pacman all he could handle.