Do you consider Prince Naseem Hamed an All-Time Great??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilistspecialist, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. Cool2008

    Cool2008 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    0
    No => look at his opponents
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23
    no

    and to those who say yes, which other ATG's do you rank behind him?
     
  3. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    37,210
    Likes Received:
    6,766
    Maybe Hamed could be considered an ATB instead of an ATG? All Time British Great :lol::lol::lol:
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    He was unhittable by novices and shot has-beens. He had no defence at all, he relied solely on reflexes, and even then he still got clocked and dropped. As soon as he fought someone with punch variety and accuracy, his skull was a pinata. The man had no jab, no defence, no fundamentals whatsoever. He had no plan B, and was exposed as such.
     
  5. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    10
    Thats the answer right there...:good
     
  6. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    37,210
    Likes Received:
    6,766
    Barrera was the first world class opponent for Hamed and he brutally exposed him as a one-trick pony. Hamed couldn't adjust in the ring. He didn't know what to do. He was dancing around, trying to use his reflexes like against his bum opponents just Barrera kept coming and hitting him with easy :lol:
     
  7. p4p_kid

    p4p_kid Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    2
    he's just a great fighter who introduced the excitement of the featherweights to the boxing fan, casual/hardcore.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Harsh, but true.
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    Yes, Naz beating up Billy Hardy and Said Lawal introduced the world to a division which in the last 25 years had spawned Salvador Sanchez, Azumah Nelson, and Jeff Fenech.
     
  10. Tszyu

    Tszyu Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, he was a good fighter and exciting to watch, but when he fought good fighters on his level, he lost or got dropped many times, Kelly dropped him how many times?
     
  11. FinalBELL

    FinalBELL Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,582
    Likes Received:
    0
    not even close!!:nono
     
  12. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    5,676
    Likes Received:
    56
    for all that he did for boxing and for the lighter weight classes. not to mention he did win some titles and was the undefeated #1 champion in his division for years I would say yes. theres other fighters who are worse fighters that are in the hall..
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    The Hall of Fame is for Hall of Famers (like Barry McGuigan).

    There is no official criteria for All-Time Great...

    ...But it certainly isn't retiring after your first loss and never having beaten one single great fighter in your entire career.
     
  14. (PimpThaSystem)

    (PimpThaSystem) Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    4
    Barrera's win over Hamed gets overrated in my opinion. Great performance by Barrera, but it wasn't the total destruction shutout that it gets made out to be.
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    20,273
    Likes Received:
    6,588
    Correct.Although he had one more fight after Barrera.But I'm surprised the excuses haven't surfaced here yet.