Do you consider Prince Naseem Hamed an All-Time Great??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilistspecialist, Oct 28, 2009.


  1. Cool2008

    Cool2008 Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
    No => look at his opponents
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    no

    and to those who say yes, which other ATG's do you rank behind him?
     
  3. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    Maybe Hamed could be considered an ATB instead of an ATG? All Time British Great :lol::lol::lol:
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    He was unhittable by novices and shot has-beens. He had no defence at all, he relied solely on reflexes, and even then he still got clocked and dropped. As soon as he fought someone with punch variety and accuracy, his skull was a pinata. The man had no jab, no defence, no fundamentals whatsoever. He had no plan B, and was exposed as such.
     
  5. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    10
    Aug 7, 2004
    Thats the answer right there...:good
     
  6. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    Barrera was the first world class opponent for Hamed and he brutally exposed him as a one-trick pony. Hamed couldn't adjust in the ring. He didn't know what to do. He was dancing around, trying to use his reflexes like against his bum opponents just Barrera kept coming and hitting him with easy :lol:
     
  7. p4p_kid

    p4p_kid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    2
    Dec 8, 2008
    he's just a great fighter who introduced the excitement of the featherweights to the boxing fan, casual/hardcore.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Harsh, but true.
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    Yes, Naz beating up Billy Hardy and Said Lawal introduced the world to a division which in the last 25 years had spawned Salvador Sanchez, Azumah Nelson, and Jeff Fenech.
     
  10. Tszyu

    Tszyu Active Member Full Member

    1,249
    0
    Aug 10, 2009
    No, he was a good fighter and exciting to watch, but when he fought good fighters on his level, he lost or got dropped many times, Kelly dropped him how many times?
     
  11. FinalBELL

    FinalBELL Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,582
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    not even close!!:nono
     
  12. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    for all that he did for boxing and for the lighter weight classes. not to mention he did win some titles and was the undefeated #1 champion in his division for years I would say yes. theres other fighters who are worse fighters that are in the hall..
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    The Hall of Fame is for Hall of Famers (like Barry McGuigan).

    There is no official criteria for All-Time Great...

    ...But it certainly isn't retiring after your first loss and never having beaten one single great fighter in your entire career.
     
  14. (PimpThaSystem)

    (PimpThaSystem) Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,774
    4
    Jun 7, 2009
    Barrera's win over Hamed gets overrated in my opinion. Great performance by Barrera, but it wasn't the total destruction shutout that it gets made out to be.
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    Correct.Although he had one more fight after Barrera.But I'm surprised the excuses haven't surfaced here yet.