Dirrell flat out robbed

And if you are stupid enough to believe that Froch landed almost 50 more punches in that fight, then you are a prime candidate for sterilization and probably should never reproduce because your IQ is likely in the sub-moron range.

 

Yep, cause i counted and its pretty accurate. Do the same, noob!

 

Not worse then Cintron vs Martinez, now that was a BLATANT robbery TWICE!

 

pleeeeeeeeeeeeeease just get over it

 

FROCH 150/153 rabbit punches

 

Did you use your fingers and toes?

 

All of the holding Dirrell was doing was irritating as hell. But he did deserve the W. Funny thing is that he actually looked stronger than Froch. The **** that was sickening was how arrogant Froch was after the fight. Dirrell took the L on the chin like a true gentleman very gracious and Froch was his sorry cocky ***** ass self.

 

I stick with what i said, if Dirrell would have boxed as he did for the last 3 rounds the fight would have been his.

Holyfield/Valuev was a totally different fight to Froch/Dirrell, it was clear that Holyfield outboxed Valuev all night, something that Dirrell didn't do.

It was also in Germany, that place is by far the worse place in Europe for decisions. :deal

 

no he wasnt robbed - was close could have gone either way

 

For those guys that use the term "robbery" in vain - go watch sweet pea vs ramirez or chavez and come back.

 

its a dead issue pretty boy, everyone with a brain and a set of eyes has reached the conclusion Dirrell was robbed. Gotta move on now. Going through some of Andre's tweets, says he's gonna be hitting the weights hard to build up some KO power, can't wait to see what he migh have in store:good

 

i agree, but this fight is a little outdated by now dont you think?

 

Time travel eh??

 

I agree with the thread title.

This was a hometown decision. On neutral turf Dirrell won hands down.

 

you've got to be a clown to believe those stats..